(no title)
RagingCactus | 1 year ago
As the references show, this is already a big source of vulnerabilities - trying to push for a change in standards would likely make the situation much worse. At the very least, old unmaintained servers will not change their behavior.
I think we should accept that this ship has sailed and leave existing protocols alone. Mandate LF and disallow CRLF in new protocols, that's fine, but I don't think we should open this particular Pandora's Box.
[1] Simple example that doesn't use CRLF/LF disagreement: https://portswigger.net/web-security/request-smuggling
[2] Complex example that uses CRLF/LF disagreement: https://portswigger.net/web-security/request-smuggling/advan... (see heading 'Request smuggling via CRLF injection')
[3] Random report on HackerOne I found where allowing LF created a vulnerability in NodeJS: https://hackerone.com/reports/2001873
[4] https://sec-consult.com/blog/detail/smtp-smuggling-spoofing-...
No comments yet.