[nomagicbullet]

My initial reaction reading this (I had t heard the news) was disbelief. How could someone so accomplished and influential be driven to such despair over what seems to be an interpersonal workplace conflict? But the more I think about it, the more I get it. Many of us pour our identities into our work. It becomes more than a job. It’s our purpose, our sense of self. When that’s destabilized or taken away, the fallout can be devastating.

It’s a sad reminder of how vulnerable those who care deeply about their work can be in the face of toxic or unjust environments. Passion and commitment, when met with indifference or hostility, can push anyone to a breaking point.

[falcor84]

>over what seems to be an interpersonal workplace conflict

Well, it started with an interpersonal workplace conflict, but ended up with him being forced to retire from his professorship and the entrepreneurial mentoring program he saw as his mission.

[mrguyorama]

We have zero data or evidence to differentiate between "He was pushed out for being right about the ethics complaint" and "he was pushed out because he was wrong about the ethics complaint and did not take that well"

People are jumping to conclusions about who the aggrieved party is because they have a vague connection to the guy who made HowStuffWorks and zero connection to the counterparty. Especially on HN, people would rather believe that "the system is rigged against the brilliant individual" rather than "the individual can often be the problem".

Just as often as upper management is corrupt, a single individual who had NO PRIOR EVIDENCE OF NEGATIVE INTERACTION WITH ANYONE goes absolutely apeshit and attempts to destroy your life.

My mother is a well respected teacher. After about 4 years of working in a new school, one of the other teachers in her department seemingly got "triggered" and went utterly insane. He started fabricating ethics complaints, lying to administrators, and even went so far as to retain a lawyer to sue the school district to have her removed for his completely made up allegations. I read the complaint and I cannot believe a lawyer was willing to be paid to participate. It was pages of insane rantings, like manifesto level, full of misspellings and mistakes and made up entirely of outright lies. The internal investigation was terrifying, because it starts as "He said/She said". Luckily he was crazy enough to fill his allegations with things that were demonstrably disprovable with documentation, but without that, the school absolutely would have just let my mother go instead of fight it.

There was no "cause", no change in department policy that favored my mother over him, no change in pecking order, nothing. He just one day decided to go to war with her. He completely lost his connection to reality. Yet to his students, he continued to teach normally, and nothing seemed off.

We have no facts. We have no evidence. We likely never will. We should reserve judgement.

[willio58]

> It becomes more than a job. It’s our purpose, our sense of self.

Also, consider Brain made a quarter of 1 Billion dollars with the sale of his company. The man didn't have to work, it was his choice to work. I think this contributes even more to the feeling that work is your identity.

[walterbell]

> Brain made a quarter of 1 Billion dollars

Incorrect. The company burned through venture capital for three years, then laid off 50% of workers and was sold in 2002 to vulture capital for ~$1MM with no cash trading hands, only a promissory note [1] to the previous underwater investors. No liquidity to founders.

The 2002 purchaser, Convex Group, scaled the company, took the company public via reverse IPO and sold it five years later to Discovery TV for $250MM. Seven years later, Discovery took a 82% loss, selling the company for $45MM.

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20240717220914/https://genesis-c...

[IlPeach]

Yeah workism is real [1]

1: https://theweek.com/culture-life/workism-new-religion

[gorjusborg]

That reading of the article is so poor it looks like you are trying to spin it intentionally.

The quote without your interpretation does not have any 'enormous ego' vibes.

One clear alternative interpretation is that he was being railroaded via office politics, wasn't equipped to deal with the hit to his image a firing would have, and didn't feel he had the energy to deal with it. No 'enormous ego' required.

Edit: were you involved in this? Your tone and interpretation made it seem so, and your username 'hulitu'... are you Dr. Li?

https://www.csc.ncsu.edu/people/hli83

[lotsofpulp]

The haughty projections about robots in the future with specific years seemed weirdly confident to me, too.

[gamblor956]

There are indications that the office space conflict was simply the last straw in a long line of interpersonal conflicts he had with other faculty.

For example, he frequently filed ethics complaints against other faculty after minor disagreements... putting their careers at risk over trivial matters.

He may have been well like by the internet but he was not well liked at the school, and the relative silence by faculty and students is pretty telling.