[biodranik]

No, you got it wrong.

Roman supported the private repo and was aware of the temporary (last 3 days only) CF logs to address CDN abuse. However, several hours ago, he (or someone else using his account?) unexpectedly made the repository public without discussing it with the project's maintainers. As a result, his account rights were temporarily restricted to clarify the situation.

There is still no response from Roman regarding his motivation for ignoring the usual governing board rules. Previously, all similar important project decisions were always discussed with maintainers/active contributors before being executed.

I hope that we resolve this strange situation successfully soon.

[rtsisyk]

Removing the MIT license from the repository and claiming it as 'my code' is not how open source works.

[Vinnl]

It's sound like the person who removed the licence also originally wrote the code, and just didn't intend to add the MIT licence to it?

[cmeacham98]

As you seem to be Alexander Borsuk...

Why the removal of the MIT license?

Was that decision put to a vote like "all important project decisions" are? I assume it can't have been unless Roman is blatantly lying about only noticing it a few days later.

[pastk]

How come the server code was (is?) de-facto closed source and this fact was kept hidden?

In a project that claims to be open-source, privacy-focused and community-driven.