top | item 42348108 (no title) rtsisyk | 1 year ago Removing the MIT license from the repository and claiming it as 'my code' is not how open source works. discuss order hn newest Vinnl|1 year ago It's sound like the person who removed the licence also originally wrote the code, and just didn't intend to add the MIT licence to it? pastk|1 year ago Nope, Roman has actively contributed to this MIT-licensed code since its inception in 2021. load replies (1) viccuad|1 year ago Though luck. Be more careful next time. That's how licences work (not only open source ones, or software ones).
Vinnl|1 year ago It's sound like the person who removed the licence also originally wrote the code, and just didn't intend to add the MIT licence to it? pastk|1 year ago Nope, Roman has actively contributed to this MIT-licensed code since its inception in 2021. load replies (1) viccuad|1 year ago Though luck. Be more careful next time. That's how licences work (not only open source ones, or software ones).
pastk|1 year ago Nope, Roman has actively contributed to this MIT-licensed code since its inception in 2021. load replies (1)
viccuad|1 year ago Though luck. Be more careful next time. That's how licences work (not only open source ones, or software ones).
Vinnl|1 year ago
pastk|1 year ago
viccuad|1 year ago