top | item 42364471 (no title) RichEO | 1 year ago It’s clear that you’re not a lawyer, because if you were you’d know that there’s no established duty of care between BrandShield and web masters. discuss order hn newest klez|1 year ago Clearly I'm not a lawyer either, but isn't accusing someone of doing something that is not true and that can have legal ramification a suable behavior in the US? pera|1 year ago According to this no one has ever been prosecuted just for sending false DMCA takedown notices:https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/51541/has-anyone-bee...They do mention a case where the defendant acted in bad faith and was found liable for damages though. load replies (1) pdpi|1 year ago Sounds like a pretty straightforward case of tortious interference, actually.
klez|1 year ago Clearly I'm not a lawyer either, but isn't accusing someone of doing something that is not true and that can have legal ramification a suable behavior in the US? pera|1 year ago According to this no one has ever been prosecuted just for sending false DMCA takedown notices:https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/51541/has-anyone-bee...They do mention a case where the defendant acted in bad faith and was found liable for damages though. load replies (1)
pera|1 year ago According to this no one has ever been prosecuted just for sending false DMCA takedown notices:https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/51541/has-anyone-bee...They do mention a case where the defendant acted in bad faith and was found liable for damages though. load replies (1)
klez|1 year ago
pera|1 year ago
https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/51541/has-anyone-bee...
They do mention a case where the defendant acted in bad faith and was found liable for damages though.
pdpi|1 year ago