(no title)
klokan | 1 year ago
We just launched TimeMap on Product Hunt: https://www.producthunt.com/posts/timemap If you find what we’re building valuable, an UPVOTE there would mean a lot.
Stanford University recently hosted an event to introduce TimeMap to the world, which you can check out here:
* Recording on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZspMtwYI98
* Event page: https://events.stanford.edu/event/the-future-of-history-disc...
The talk dives into how TimeMap was built, including our use of Linked Data, OpenHistoricalMaps, LLM pre-processing, indexing algorithms, and more. It also highlights amazing partner projects like Pelagios, TimeMachine, and our amazing partner institutions such as the David Rumsey Map Collection, British Library, ETH Zurich and many others.
TimeMap has been a dream project of mine for years — I’m thrilled to see it coming to life and would love to hear your thoughts or feedback!
For context: I’m also the founder of OpenMapTiles.org, a MapLibre.org board member, author of GDAL2Tiles, and contributor to other open-source projects. Currently, I’m serving as the CEO of MapTiler.com.
Looking forward to the discussion, and thank you for taking the time to check this out!
speleding|1 year ago
(And this had geopolitical consequences, e.g., the invading Spanish could not cross some of the bodies of water present in the sixteen hundreds that are not there now.)
wongarsu|1 year ago
bhupy|1 year ago
One thing that I've also wanted was to be able to reason about the total timeline using the Holocene calendar[1] instead of the standard BC/BCE AD/CE timeline. It makes it easier to internalize how long ago (or how recent) certain civilizations were without having to do the wrap-around math in one's head. Would be nice to be able to maybe toggle that view.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_calendar
zamadatix|1 year ago
moralestapia|1 year ago
They way history is taught misses a lot of the context that only makes sense when you put it into a map like this one.
If you could somehow "open source" at least the data side of this, I'd be glad to contribute. I have a bunch of history books from ancient latino civilizations.
okok3857|1 year ago
ascorbic|1 year ago
mariopt|1 year ago
This is a really project and really helpful to understand history. I noticed that several data points about the Portuguese Colonial Empire are wrong, is there any place where I can submit a ticket about it?
When the royal succession crisis took place in 1580, according to the blood line, the King of Spain was indeed the next in line but both Kingdoms remain independent, you can also find evidence of this in the name: King Philip III was called King Philip I in Portugal, the following one (Philip IV) was named the Philip II. In Timemap, when you check 1580, it shows the Portuguese territories with the Spanish royal flag, which is wrong because everyone understood back then that if Spain tried to dictated anything about the Portuguese overseas territories, this would be taken as a declaration of war. This is reason why the Treaty of Tordesillas was signed, Portugal and Spain divide the world and would not step on each other.
Also found things like Malacca, the flag is missing the dates of duration: 1511-1641 Same for Macau, the map states that the Portuguese rule ended in 1845 but in reality it only became independent in 1999. Many other important missing bits that, although technically they don't as territories, do represent groups, example: The city of Nagasaki was built/shaped by Portuguese merchants during 1511-1641 and was indeed under Portuguese administration during 1580-1586.
Among many other bits that would make this reply too long for HN.
egorfine|1 year ago
Is there a process to provide feedback and correct errors on the map?
klokan|1 year ago
grahamj|1 year ago
singularity2001|1 year ago
ninalanyon|1 year ago
Why are the boundaries of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden not shown for the Kalmar Union? They are for England at Scotland in 1620 when they were under the personal union of James, (VI of Scotland I of England). What's the reason for the difference?
dotancohen|1 year ago
shireboy|1 year ago
Ux is great but I got in a state in maps where I couldn’t get back the control at the top that lets you pick people/battles without refreshing the page.
phasnox|1 year ago
Question, why Ferdinand III does not appear under people during 1200s on the Hispanic area?
He is arguably the most important historical figure during that time period:
- Unified Castille and Leon
- Lead the reconquest that resulted in what is Spain today.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_III_of_Castile
EDIT:
He was the literally the directly responsible of the map changes during that era
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
abe94|1 year ago
It would also be cool to have filters of pre history, Hunter Gatherer, Early Farming, Bronze age and so on!
_1|1 year ago
dotancohen|1 year ago
Also many historical treaties did not define borders to the level of detail they we are used to today.
BehindBlueEyes|1 year ago
Either way, good job! As a low key OSM contributor, this motivates me to contribute to the mapping, if data can be added by the public.
Fauntleroy|1 year ago
sieabahlpark|1 year ago
[deleted]
EmberJune46|1 year ago
[deleted]