[dogboat]

I use copilot at work. Why? Corporate IT/compliance. Getting cursor vetted ain't a hill I want to fight for.

[osigurdson]

This sounds horribly restrictive.

[bee_rider]

It seems like it ought to be reasonably restrictive to install some new AI tool on dev machines.

* they don’t know who’s behind it, what’ll it output?

* they don’t know the business model. Is will it be used to exfiltrate code from the company, aka train on the company’s codebase? Other text files you open?

I’m not at all saying I think Cursor is doing that—training on customer data would be a completely unethical business practice, bordering on malware, usually companies whose names get bounced around here are not so bad. But, the hypothetical host company doesn’t know anything about them, so it is prudent to require some checking.

[alkonaut]

I don't even use copilot (yet) because the process of reviewing it through all the different obstacles (security, legal, budget) is on it's 24th month or something. I think many people in traditional industry can relate.

[pc86]

Corporations having IT governance and some restrictions on what apps you can install on company hardware is not remotely new or surprising.

Sometimes it causes issues, 99% of the time it's fine.

[yunohn]

I’m not sure of any company that blindly allows software like Cursor, that explicitly uploads code/embeddings to their servers.