(no title)
tommilburn | 1 year ago
signed up for an account with my real name to share a doc i've been working on for a long, long time now - i've had UC since high school, and have written an extensive guide of what i've learned, if it helps you or anyone else you know who might be getting scoped:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bTW2rdF744woSPpFsUeSaFYa...
hgomersall|1 year ago
Given those numbers, how often should everyone get a colonoscopy?
That's before we get on to the potential harm from a false diagnosis (which is much higher without additional priors).
Yes, absolutely people should pay attention to their bowels and get a colonoscopy when it's indicated. Let's not all rush to get one though unless there's some reason for it.
tommilburn|1 year ago
i also believe pre-screening (stool sample testing, mostly) is getting better, which would potentially help categorize who does and does not need an actual colonoscopy in the future
these are all US stats[0], which i'd imagine is a broadly worse-off group than the UK in terms of like, ultraprocessed foods and other risk factors, but this stood out to me:
> Lifetime Risk of Developing Cancer: Approximately 4.0 percent of men and women will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer at some point during their lifetime, based on 2018–2021 data, excluding 2020 due to COVID.
anecdotally, i think with gastro problems there's a lot of individual latitude where serious problems might go undetected, under-reported, or assumed to have a less serious cause - i also think (but do not know) that colon cancer develops slowly, which may mean there's a long potential where it could be caught, detected, or risks flagged early by a colonoscopy, which, to me, outweighs the risks of "serious complications" from the procedure
[0] https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]