[Nadya]

I would greatly appreciate if you engaged with what I wrote and not what you think I wrote if you're going to make the bold claim that I'm not engaging in good faith.

Absolutely nowhere did I equate writing a book to grooming. I equated selling the book in the greater context that "providing children with potentially harmful/dangerous information should be illegal because it grooms them to commit harmful actions to themselves or others" and this context would carry the implications that by "selling" I am referring particularly to "selling it to children" since "providing children with potentially harmful/dangerous information should be illegal because it grooms them to commit harmful actions to themselves or others". With my argument being would it be criminal for an AI but not for a human?

So to clarify the argument: Writing the book is fine. Selling the book to adults is fine. Adults reading the book is fine. But if providing dangerous information to children should be made illegal - how would selling such a book to a child not be considered illegal? Because it was written by a human and not an AI?

[SiempreViernes]

Oh, sorry let me rephrase: You consider selling the Anarchists Cookbook grooming!?

Calling it fraud would be more apt, that is definitely a book you share copies of for free.

To clarify: yes this is indeed the sort of attention I think your objection deserves.

[Nadya]

"Kids having access to AI is too dangerous. Kids learning how to make explosives and LSD is perfectly safe."

Have a happy holidays.