(no title)
plank | 1 year ago
* My PhD was about how to treat a (quantum mechanical) system inside a cavity: a cavity with one perfect mirror and one 99.999999% perfect mirror. The (one dimensional) universe was made whole by another perfect mirror at the other side of the non-perfect mirror (in ASCII art:
[100%] —l— [100-epsilon] ——L——— [100%]
With L >> l. The ‘whole universe’ solution was simple (using standard quantum mechanics techniques), the ‘lossy’ ‘small universe’ was not. But they needed to be the same (physically). Thus using the exact solution for the ‘complete’ (l+L) universe and comparing it to possible ‘small’ (l) universe models in which some non-linear term accounted for loss. The connection between how a lossy system (in which entropy exists/is a driving ‘force’) and a losless system (in which everything is conserved) is thus not a new insight;-0
mojomark|1 year ago
IIAOPSW|1 year ago
In other words, entropy is equivalent to bits of information needed to specify the complete state of the system leaking outside of the confines of where those bits are being observed by an experiment (eg tunneling through an imperfect mirror).
Entropy is an accounting tool to keep track of how many bits are missing, and how far this ignorance has percolated into what you can safely predict about the system.
plank|1 year ago
mike_ivanov|1 year ago
plank|1 year ago
Had to do some searching;-)
Info on thesis: https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=0ae63403-264b-4bf0-91c...
The document itself (self hosted) https://gofile.me/7uDSJ/sGJCFD3W7
Probably most important article: (sorry, only abstract): https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.24...
revskill|1 year ago
[deleted]