(no title)
encody | 1 year ago
Am I understanding this correctly? Because it sounds like the Verge is complaining about a change that should net them marginally more(?) ad $ (and is to YouTube's disadvantage) because a few readers complained, and they're just trying to blame YouTube instead.
I'm confused.
ghusto|1 year ago
It's YouTube's choice to do whatever they like with their own product, but the reason what they've chosen to do is problematic is:
1. It's yet another bait'n'switch
2. It is shady as fuck to not only make no announcement about the change, but make it difficult to even figure out what's happened
In short; yes it's Google's prerogative to be a bag of dicks, but let's not pretend that's not exactly what they are (continuing to be)
gruez|1 year ago
Source for this claim? The article doesn't make this accusation, and considering this is a B2B product that requires manual approval to use, I wouldn't be surprised if they sent out this as email rather than something to their blog. Searching for "YouTube Player for Publishers", it looks like their last mention of that product was in 2018, and it was only a passing mention.
xethos|1 year ago
> Somewhat straightforwardly, YouTube has chosen to degrade the user experience of the embedded player publishers like Vox Media use, and the only way to get that link back is by using a slightly different player *that pays us less and YouTube more*
YouTube made the B2B product worse, and in order to get that functionality back (for now), the Verge would have to take a pay cut