(no title)
d3VwsX | 1 year ago
Too bad the new version was not completed for MS-DOS. If it was it would have been possible to play it on not just on Windows, but pretty much every modern and near-future (and far-future?) system.
DOSBox is a very good virtual machine for 2D games actually. It can support games far beyond what any real DOS hardware could. I wish there was support for exporting to DOS-executables included in some modern game engines, since that would provide at least a single fixed, future-safe, target platform. The closest I know of is an old DOS port of Löve 2D, but it only supports 320x200 VGA graphics. There is nothing limiting DOSBox itself to not support virtual VESA SVGA modes up to modern graphics modes (as long as x and y sizes each fit in unsigned 16-bit integers).
suprjami|1 year ago
If that means Allegro ⁴ then I maintain a fork for use with DJGPP which can compile DOS binaries:
https://github.com/superjamie/allegro-4.2.3.1-xc
I agree DOSBox is a good programming target these days.
M95D|1 year ago
Systems today can't run MS-DOS, or any other programs that use BIOS interrupts. They aren't there anymore.
d3VwsX|1 year ago
If a DOS game is distributed, as GOG does for old DOS games, with a bundled installer and DOSBox configuration, normal users would not even have to know they are playing a non-native game. We can treat it as just a generic virtual machine for games. The fact that it happens to also be backwards compatible with DOS games made 40 years ago is just a fun bonus, even if that is currently its primary purpose.
Andys|1 year ago