top | item 42455652 (no title) sdf4j | 1 year ago First time I hear those claims about Postgres. Was that the sentiment 30 years ago? discuss order hn newest Tostino|1 year ago If say it was only about 15 years ago that the Postgres is slow stuff started dying off. Right around 2010. dannyobrien|1 year ago It was definitely initially seen as big and cumbersome compared to MySQL, but sentiment shifted. cryptos|1 year ago MySQL was kind of a fast toy database in the early days, but it was good enough to power simple PHP based websites. bcoates|1 year ago 14 years or less. Any version of Postgres before 9.0 was a nightmare to administer as a real production transactional dbms, at least the off the shelf version without a whole lot of tweaking without a (then very rare) pg expert. fulafel|1 year ago I don't remember that. But I remember having basic DB features like transactions while MySQL didn't.
Tostino|1 year ago If say it was only about 15 years ago that the Postgres is slow stuff started dying off. Right around 2010.
dannyobrien|1 year ago It was definitely initially seen as big and cumbersome compared to MySQL, but sentiment shifted. cryptos|1 year ago MySQL was kind of a fast toy database in the early days, but it was good enough to power simple PHP based websites.
cryptos|1 year ago MySQL was kind of a fast toy database in the early days, but it was good enough to power simple PHP based websites.
bcoates|1 year ago 14 years or less. Any version of Postgres before 9.0 was a nightmare to administer as a real production transactional dbms, at least the off the shelf version without a whole lot of tweaking without a (then very rare) pg expert. fulafel|1 year ago I don't remember that. But I remember having basic DB features like transactions while MySQL didn't.
fulafel|1 year ago I don't remember that. But I remember having basic DB features like transactions while MySQL didn't.
Tostino|1 year ago
dannyobrien|1 year ago
cryptos|1 year ago
bcoates|1 year ago
fulafel|1 year ago