[synctext]

> The great pseudoscience of this 'computer science' thinking

You spelled Nobel-level science wrong.

Most of Levin work is not easy to understand or appreciate. Our university lab has been doing cooperative intelligence for decades. The insight in some of his work is revolutionary. He shows why randomness is much more intelligent then most scientist think.

[filoeleven]

I think his work in biomechanics is easier to grasp than this, because the level of cognition he's talking about and working with there is (much?) closer to ours than what's described in this paper. It's easy to say there's no "there" there if you're unfamiliar with how his work is being successfully applied elsewhere.