Having runtime type validation utilities such as Typebox help here. Even in the absence of type guarantees at I/O boundaries (where you have to just "lie" about the type you really have, which would be `unknown` if we were honest), I'd certainly rather my code at least specify what types it expects from the server than attempt to access arbitrary attributes in various places.
Oh yeah definitely, I write the types that I expect from the API - the point the original comment is making is that the state of reality is not your types, it's what the actual API returns.
But yeah if you use something like Zod you can at least say "this is what I'm pretty sure the API should return" but also define what should happen if things change / don't meet your types.
DangitBobby|1 year ago
ervine|1 year ago
But yeah if you use something like Zod you can at least say "this is what I'm pretty sure the API should return" but also define what should happen if things change / don't meet your types.