top | item 42466586 (no title) mjan22640 | 1 year ago Joules is the solution to both the problems (the second is that Wh for energy is as silly as speed hours for distance) discuss order hn newest XorNot|1 year ago Watt-hours is a perfectly pragmatic unit. Measure instantaneous power and multiply by a common human unit of time. It's easy to compare. ben_w|1 year ago Part of me is tempted to suggest kilograms as a unit of energy.428.6 kg relativistic mass-energy equivalent: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=10.7PWh%2F%28c%5E2%29But then, I am a silly person. load replies (2) sbierwagen|1 year ago >(the second is that Wh for energy is as silly as speed hours for distance)This would be a devastating own if a single Joule wasn't exactly equal to a Watt-second.
XorNot|1 year ago Watt-hours is a perfectly pragmatic unit. Measure instantaneous power and multiply by a common human unit of time. It's easy to compare. ben_w|1 year ago Part of me is tempted to suggest kilograms as a unit of energy.428.6 kg relativistic mass-energy equivalent: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=10.7PWh%2F%28c%5E2%29But then, I am a silly person. load replies (2)
ben_w|1 year ago Part of me is tempted to suggest kilograms as a unit of energy.428.6 kg relativistic mass-energy equivalent: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=10.7PWh%2F%28c%5E2%29But then, I am a silly person. load replies (2)
sbierwagen|1 year ago >(the second is that Wh for energy is as silly as speed hours for distance)This would be a devastating own if a single Joule wasn't exactly equal to a Watt-second.
XorNot|1 year ago
ben_w|1 year ago
428.6 kg relativistic mass-energy equivalent: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=10.7PWh%2F%28c%5E2%29
But then, I am a silly person.
sbierwagen|1 year ago
This would be a devastating own if a single Joule wasn't exactly equal to a Watt-second.