(no title)
mikeortman | 1 year ago
File a police report, go through the right channels. If you know its yours, call the police department non-emergency and explain the situation
mikeortman | 1 year ago
File a police report, go through the right channels. If you know its yours, call the police department non-emergency and explain the situation
nostromo|1 year ago
In my jurisdiction in the US it doesn’t matter if someone purchased the stolen goods or not, the goods still belong to the owner. This is sometimes called the "nemo dat" rule:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemo_dat_quod_non_habet
The person buying the stolen goods would need to file a claim against the thief to recover their money, but the goods still belong to the original owner. And this is how it should be, since it’s added reason not to buy goods you suspect are stolen.
And yes, you should always try and work with the police first and foremost.
jorvi|1 year ago
> however, in many cases, more than one innocent party is involved, making judgment difficult for courts and leading to numerous exceptions to the general rule that aim to give a degree of protection to bona fide purchasers and original owners
> The person buying the stolen goods would need to file a claim against the thief to recover their money
Generally as long as the purchase is made in good faith, you are wrong. It is the original owner that needs to file a claim against the thief.
Obviously, what constitutes a sale in "good faith" is a rather imprecise science, although one steady element is the sales price: it needs to have been appropriate for the item. So for example a mint bicycle or antique coin should sell near sticker price.
ostacke|1 year ago
[1] https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sj%C3%A4lvt%C3%A4kt
easyThrowaway|1 year ago
Xmd5a|1 year ago
IIRC, they had a security hole on their payment page: they forgot to implement SCA (strong customer authentification, aka 2FA for payments). Had they done this, the liability would have shifted onto the bank/card issuer. For some reason they decided to go after the customers in vain resentment, were acquired and their product was discontinued.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Nuraphone/comments/8iw3he/beware_on...
randunel|1 year ago
chii|1 year ago
i hope that isn't true. A buyer of stolen goods needs to accept that a consequence of it is that they could lose possession of said good. This is why for expensive goods, you should ensure you're not buying stolen goods.
mosselman|1 year ago
It is logical that it works that way. Proving something is owned by someone else can be quite hard for certain items.
neilv|1 year ago
A bunch of the other suggestions, here on HN Streetwise ProTips, can get self and/or friends beaten, stabbed, and/or arrested.
joshuahaglund|1 year ago
Not saying confronting thieves is for everyone. But it's not necessarily as physical as you think.
Thorrez|1 year ago
TylerE|1 year ago
vorpalhex|1 year ago
It's great that you think _someone will handle that for you_ but it is probably a fantasy. Unfortunately you will probably need to self resolve. If you think it is going to escalate to violence, bring overwhelming force.
darreninthenet|1 year ago
srockets|1 year ago
FabHK|1 year ago
Crime Alert
THEFT OF BICYCLE
AT THIS NEIGHBOURHOOD
ON 20 MARCH 2013 @ 7 AM
Witnesses, please call Tanglin Police Division
(phone number redacted)
happyopossum|1 year ago
GeekyBear|1 year ago
> Police to give out free air tag tracking devices to combat rise in stolen vehicles
https://www.princewilliamtimes.com/news/police-to-give-out-f...
wahnfrieden|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
MagicMoonlight|1 year ago
I know it’s false in the UK and I’d imagine it is false in any country where the law is based on UK law.
Failing to retrieve it at the time is going to mean losing it forever. If you find a crackhead with your phone and wait for someone else to retrieve it, that phone is long gone.
harha|1 year ago
Nakagawa835|1 year ago
wouldbecouldbe|1 year ago
sneak|1 year ago
[deleted]
jki275|1 year ago