top | item 42473813

(no title)

monsecchris | 1 year ago

It’s so insignificant that at best we might delay the climate catastrophe by a few seconds

discuss

order

Xelbair|1 year ago

People might not like this, but that's true.

as long as non-western countries keep polluting - even if we achieve net-zero nothing will change other than us feeling better and patting ourselves in the back.

threeseed|1 year ago

This is a very misguided view of the situation.

a) The transition to clean energy, transportation etc by Western countries funds the development and investment in new technologies. These then filter down to developing countries when the economies of scale kick in e.g. solar panels, electric cars.

b) There are also other benefits to cleaner solutions than just trying to achieve net-zero. Reductions in pollution reduce morbidity, improve productivity, improve happiness, secure food supply etc.

fragmede|1 year ago

Knocking the western 30% of pollution down to zero is still meaningful, even if the remaining 70% isn't affected (which it will be). China, one is the most polluting non-western countries, is going to renewables and electric vehicles at a faster rate than some of the western countries.

greenavocado|1 year ago

Drinking game. Drop Google Street View anywhere on the territory of India. If there is a trash pile visible, take a shot.

fulafel|1 year ago

And as long as oil producing countries (hello uk/us) keep pumping it out. We need intl agreements to ramp this down fast.

beo35|1 year ago

Per capita EU is a far bigger polluter than non developed countries.

exe34|1 year ago

[deleted]