top | item 42473926 (no title) alex-robbins | 1 year ago "Source First License 1.1" is an interesting choice. Sounds like something specific to this developer (so far, at least). I'm not savvy enough to be sure, but it doesn't sound compatible with any of the commonly accepted-as-FOSS licenses.https://github.com/futo-org/Grayjay.Desktop/blob/373cd8448cb... discuss order hn newest bramhaag|1 year ago > it doesn't sound compatible with any of the commonly accepted-as-FOSS licenses.Correct, it violates the four essential freedoms by placing restrictions on commercial use amongst other things. akimbostrawman|1 year ago It's closer to source available than proprietary unknown|1 year ago [deleted]
bramhaag|1 year ago > it doesn't sound compatible with any of the commonly accepted-as-FOSS licenses.Correct, it violates the four essential freedoms by placing restrictions on commercial use amongst other things.
bramhaag|1 year ago
Correct, it violates the four essential freedoms by placing restrictions on commercial use amongst other things.
akimbostrawman|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]