[amritananda]

>If it was simply to get their own state surely they could have achieved it by now

The PLO has accepted a two-state solution since 1981, for nearly 44 years. This is what Avner Yaniv called the "peace offensive", and is especially dangerous because it weakens Israeli attempts to deny a Palestinian state. The solution to this is simple: provocation to encourage extremist elements. Of course in 1982 Israel went a bit further and used provocation to set a precedent to invade Lebanon in an attempt to destroy the PLO entirely.

>Which means returning to their original homes (I don't see how you could do that without throwing out the Jewish 'colonists').

This is not what the right to return is. This is what Amnesty has to say about return:

>Where possible, Palestinians should be able to return to their original home or lands. If this is not possible -- because they no longer exist, have been converted to other uses, or because of a valid competing claim -- they should be allowed to return to the vicinity of their original home.

"Valid competing claim" includes the modern-day owner of the home.

[weatherlite]

> This is what Amnesty has to say about return:

So Amnesty decides for the Palestinians what the right of return means? Nice. Yeah, sounds super realistic that's what Hamas means when they talk about the right of return.