top | item 42510384

(no title)

meowfly | 1 year ago

Just a clarification to my comment.

If I remember correctly, I don't think the claim was teen pregnancy was the "primary driver of population growth" but one of the variables that has a large impact on fertility rates. Most people see the reduction in teen moms as a positive development.

I also think the reduction in unplanned pregnancy to be a net positive. So 20 somethings finishing school before starting a family is good, but it's also probably resposible for fewer large families. I believe polling shows most woman want more children than they actually end up having. I'm sure part of that explanation is that people are starting families later in life.

discuss

order

WarOnPrivacy|1 year ago

> I don't think the claim was teen pregnancy was the "primary driver of population growth" but one of the variables

When I restated your original argument, I was careful to say "a" primary driver.

My own counter argument is based on worthwhile data but is submitted without the evidence thereof. Given that last, I'm inclined to frame your assertions in reasonable light.