There's a standard test for this: The O'Connor Tweezer Dexterity Test.[1]
There's a board with small holes, a supply of metal pins, and a tweezer for putting pins in the holes. It's overpriced, because it's "medical".
Some electronics assembly plants use such a test to screen new hires.
Tweezer dexterity improves with practice. Hands are more precise than vision.
Looking through a microscope, you can position something within a thousandth of an inch with tweezers. This is familiar to anyone who's placed surface mount parts on a board by hand.
> Implementation of a surgical swear jar initiative
Yes, the main goal of a surgical site is to avoid swearing
> our findings are not applicable to children younger than 4 years for whom the buzz wire game’s small parts may represent a choking hazard, although these individuals are unlikely to be currently employed in secondary care.
Now, that's a point. I'd avoid a 0-3 toddler if i could choose so before some surgery.
It would seem that swearing is correlated with higher skill. It may be premature to suggest that we should encourage increased swearing - correlation is not causation - but it seems the logical avenue to pursue. Further research is needed.
Animats|1 year ago
Some electronics assembly plants use such a test to screen new hires.
Tweezer dexterity improves with practice. Hands are more precise than vision. Looking through a microscope, you can position something within a thousandth of an inch with tweezers. This is familiar to anyone who's placed surface mount parts on a board by hand.
[1] https://www.amazon.com/s?k=tweezer+dexterity+test
pugworthy|1 year ago
I was really expecting to see it was the classic “Operation“ game when I first saw mention in the paper.
wslh|1 year ago
chaos_emergent|1 year ago
qrybam|1 year ago
magic_smoke_ee|1 year ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barber_surgeon
woliveirajr|1 year ago
Yes, the main goal of a surgical site is to avoid swearing
> our findings are not applicable to children younger than 4 years for whom the buzz wire game’s small parts may represent a choking hazard, although these individuals are unlikely to be currently employed in secondary care.
Now, that's a point. I'd avoid a 0-3 toddler if i could choose so before some surgery.
SiempreViernes|1 year ago
> Implementation of a surgical swear jar initiative should be considered for future fundraising events.
from which it is clear that suppression of swearing by the surgeons is very much not the intended goal.
munch117|1 year ago