I'm curious, what specifically you're interested in from openrouter? Do they offer specific LLMs, or is it just a great way to kick the tires on new models as they emerge?
The original intention behind t2x was to be "functionality first", and make an opinionated call on which LLMs get used for specific functionality. However I think the way to go will be sane defaults and then allow user-specified models from something like openrouter.
I'm the author of t2x and shrugginface.com, I'm surprised to see this landed on HN a month after I first shared it.
I originally planned to make it real during the holiday break but got distracted by other projects. This is the inspiration bump I needed, so I'll get back to shipping over the coming weeks
If you run `ls -la | t2x "sort these files alphabetically"`, it will do the right thing.
However, subcommand like `t2x ask` are used to route you to a different model with different behavior. The ask subcommand currently makes requests to perplexity, where you can ask questions and get near realtime grounding from the world.
Why do you want this? Not only is it unreliable and inefficient to do such things with LLMs, but we already have easy ways to do them with existing tools.
I work with computers and do data wrangling on a daily basis. What am I missing?
sigoden|1 year ago
The only difference is that you provide subcommands, while aichat requires users to create various roles.
t2x 'Write a ...' => aichat 'Write a ...'
t2x ask file.md 'What is...' => aichat -f file.md 'What is...'
t2x summary /path/to/file => aichat -r summary -f /path/to/file
t2x summary "This is a..." => aichat -r summary "This is a..."
t2x orc /path/to/image.png => aichat -r orc -f /path/to/image.png
> Note, In AIChat, `-r/--role` specifies the role to use, `-f/--file` indicates the file or URL input.
jakedahn|1 year ago
rodcul|1 year ago
that would be sweet
jakedahn|1 year ago
The original intention behind t2x was to be "functionality first", and make an opinionated call on which LLMs get used for specific functionality. However I think the way to go will be sane defaults and then allow user-specified models from something like openrouter.
jakedahn|1 year ago
I'm the author of t2x and shrugginface.com, I'm surprised to see this landed on HN a month after I first shared it.
I originally planned to make it real during the holiday break but got distracted by other projects. This is the inspiration bump I needed, so I'll get back to shipping over the coming weeks
marc|1 year ago
Glad to hear it served as inspiration. The video looks promising!
youssefabdelm|1 year ago
All I want to do is talk to my computer, like:
"Sort these files" or whatever. Straight away. No noise.
And it should have a history of what was done already, so it knows what I'm talking about.
If people are concerned about safety, it could just be a 'mode' or an app that isn't a terminal but looks like a terminal.
jeswin|1 year ago
There's aichat, which you can use in REPL mode to do exactly that: https://github.com/sigoden/aichat
Shameless plug: I mostly use my own work: https://github.com/codespin-ai/codespin
But it requires you to pipe: `ls | codespin go sort`. Maybe I should add what you're suggesting.
jakedahn|1 year ago
However, subcommand like `t2x ask` are used to route you to a different model with different behavior. The ask subcommand currently makes requests to perplexity, where you can ask questions and get near realtime grounding from the world.
satisfice|1 year ago
I work with computers and do data wrangling on a daily basis. What am I missing?
w0m|1 year ago
https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt
Has nice shell integration.
pmarreck|1 year ago
simonw|1 year ago
rcdwealth|1 year ago
[deleted]