top | item 42559070

(no title)

tg180 | 1 year ago

> The CFAA[1][2] is an arcane and ancient piece of legislation that could use an overhaul, especially with some of the vague language it contains.

I imagine that this is the reason why the charge is "unlawful transfer of confidential phone records", which is something much more specific.

From PACER, it's also stated that he filled out the CJA23 financial affidavit to demonstrate his inability to afford a lawyer (it's quite something to get caught like this and not even manage to earn enough to pay for a lawyer).

Additionally, "the defendant waives the rights provided by Rule 5 and/or Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure" means that he is choosing to streamline the initial procedures and is waiving supervised release or probation, suggesting that the prosecution's case is strong and that he is opting for an expedited process.

discuss

order

oyashirochama|1 year ago

One fun thing is personal recording isn't a protected right in the military and has to be stated if you're recording in an office for personal reasons. (official recording is usually stated as a usage agreement), or literally put on the device as a sticker.

He's also a low level enlisted so its not surprising he was unable to afford a lawyer.