The secret is that restaurants which make traditional cacio e pepe are using pasta water to emulsify the sauce.
But it's not the same pasta water you're using at home!
Only a tiny amount of starch is coming off of the 500g of pasta you just cooked in the proper ratio in 5000g of water (with 50g of salt). They've been cooking with their pasta water all day or all week; It's completely full of starch that came off the other pasta.
Dump a bunch of cornstarch or flour in there to get above 1% concentration (or more efficiently, into a tiny portion in a bowl) to replicate the emulsifying effect, or just use a different emulsifier.
I make fresh tomato pasta sauces this way as well as the cheese based ones sometimes. A bit of butter and olive oil in the sauce, minimal water in with the pasta (I really like orecchiette) and finish the pasta off in the sauce with a bit of the minimal remaining water. Very clingy, very silky.
The phase diagrams are great. This really raises the bar for cook books. If you can't show a diagram to explain why you chose that ratio of ingredients, why should I trust you to have made the optimal sauce?
I took a trip to my local university library once and found the food science section. It made On Food and Cooking look like Green Eggs and Ham in comparison and I learned more than I cared to about pineapple canning.
(To be fair, McGee’s work does exactly what I did but with multiple orders of magnitude more effort: summarizing food science journal papers into single paragraphs.)
One thing that’s always struck me as fun about cooking as a science is that your reagents need to be live calibrated by look and feel. Want to use the right amount of cyder vinegar but it’s from a brand / manufacturer you don’t know? You’re going to have to live titrate it with your mouth!
Don’t even get me started on inconsistencies between egg manufacturers. Clara’s lecithin content seems to be at least 10% stronger than Number 4’s, and she is also more tolerant of being stroked.
This is ubiquitous in baking at least. Also in confectionery where phase changes and structures are important (the canonical example being tempering). The extreme is probably Modernist cuisine.
You can look at the book "ratio" which presents a small number of standard recipes as proportions, with some hints for modification. I'd also recommend Lateral Cooking which describes recipes in terms of spectrums of ingredient variation or addition, usually starting with the simplest form. Finally there's a lot of interest in physics for coffee brewing, particularly pourover, but I'm somewhat skeptical of the rigour in that field and how much of it translates to better tasting cups.
Your comment is probably tongue in cheek, but this level of detail is pretty standard for advanced cooking. Serious Eats, Chef Steps or What’s Eating Dan have published loads of recipes backed up by research and accompanied by great graphs.
Science and empiricism usually eventually wins out over the long term but thankfully for human civilisation, people have been able to achieve extremely good outcomes in things with very loose models and folk wisdom - for instance sports people don't need to understand physics to "Bend it like Beckham"
In cooking, the folklore knew that salting your egg mix before beating an omelette long before Chemistry could catch up and explain it. In the meantime all the cynics were making worse omelettes
I'm not sure most cookbooks claim to offer an optimal recipe or even that there is an optimal one and that preference may play a big role. Some sites like serious eats do more investigation but I agree, I really like the phase diagram approach. Seems to best apply for stabilized colloids (mayo, ice cream, vinaigrettes, etc).
A true Italian grandmother or a skilled home chef from
Rome would never need a scientific recipe for Cacio and pepe,
relying instead on instinct and years of experience.
Another completely viable solution (other than adding extra starch) I’ve found is to sprinkle a bit of sodium citrate (the sodium salt of citric acid, a common food additive and cheap on Amazon) over the cheese before adding to the pan. This improves the melting qualities of the cheese and avoids the starch issue altogether. You’re basically using pecorino velveeta.
One interesting aspect of pasta sauces is that the amount of starch they need is usually incompatible with the recommended amount of water to boil the pasta in, and if you use less water, your italian friends are going to complain.
Cheating by adding some starch is the right approach, and works much more reliably.
Why do we need so much water when cooking pasta, is it even correct? I know pasta tend to stick if you have less water, boiling hard with lots of water alleviates that, but so does some stirring.
Use a short wide pan and just barely keep the noodles covered. You will get better pasta, easier cacio e Pepe and reduced energy costs related to pasta.
Note that if you're after the perfect recipe and you want to find the ideal ratios/temperature aso, changing the setup "one factor at a time" is a working but sub-optimal strategy. You want to look into DoE (Design of Experiments)
I would also like to see a study which considers the age of the pecorino.
I seem to have an easier time of getting the proper emulsion with older drier pecorino, and less risk of clumping
I've made a lot of Cacio e Pepe over the years, the best video on the subject is Ethan Chlebowski imo. Ethan Chlebowski videos are generally REALLY great.
I prepared this dish a couple of times, the second time I randomly got lucky and made a great cacio e pepe, since then all my attempts turn out clumpy, “mozzarella-like” and not creamy.
No matter how many videos I watched, I could never make it well enough.
You had the temperature too high. I use an IR thermometer. Nonna from the old country just knows how long to wait for it to cool down enough which is why it looks like magic easy in their YouTube videos.
I must admit, the paper inspired me cook a pasta as close as possible to suggestions, together with Claude ingesting the PDF and the result was really good.
In Italy we just add to the pan some of the water in which the pasta was cooked; this is rich in starch due to the cooking process. This works with other recipes as well, for example gricia or aglio olio & peperoncino. I guess that adding flour would produce a texture more similar to gravy and that's not what we're going for in traditional Italian cooking.
The main trick (to add cornstarch in order to achieve the right creaminess) is good for lots of recipes where you have milk/cheese and you want to make it creamy. It's a real ace up the cook's sleeve.
[+] [-] mapt|1 year ago|reply
But it's not the same pasta water you're using at home!
Only a tiny amount of starch is coming off of the 500g of pasta you just cooked in the proper ratio in 5000g of water (with 50g of salt). They've been cooking with their pasta water all day or all week; It's completely full of starch that came off the other pasta.
Dump a bunch of cornstarch or flour in there to get above 1% concentration (or more efficiently, into a tiny portion in a bowl) to replicate the emulsifying effect, or just use a different emulsifier.
[+] [-] csantini|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] wlll|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] chongli|1 year ago|reply
The simple, classic Italian cheese pastas (cacio e pepe as well as carbonara) are so delicious you can't just eat a small bite. You need a big bowl!
[+] [-] tommiegannert|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] gorgoiler|1 year ago|reply
(To be fair, McGee’s work does exactly what I did but with multiple orders of magnitude more effort: summarizing food science journal papers into single paragraphs.)
One thing that’s always struck me as fun about cooking as a science is that your reagents need to be live calibrated by look and feel. Want to use the right amount of cyder vinegar but it’s from a brand / manufacturer you don’t know? You’re going to have to live titrate it with your mouth!
Don’t even get me started on inconsistencies between egg manufacturers. Clara’s lecithin content seems to be at least 10% stronger than Number 4’s, and she is also more tolerant of being stroked.
[+] [-] joshvm|1 year ago|reply
You can look at the book "ratio" which presents a small number of standard recipes as proportions, with some hints for modification. I'd also recommend Lateral Cooking which describes recipes in terms of spectrums of ingredient variation or addition, usually starting with the simplest form. Finally there's a lot of interest in physics for coffee brewing, particularly pourover, but I'm somewhat skeptical of the rigour in that field and how much of it translates to better tasting cups.
[+] [-] gghootch|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] djtango|1 year ago|reply
In cooking, the folklore knew that salting your egg mix before beating an omelette long before Chemistry could catch up and explain it. In the meantime all the cynics were making worse omelettes
[+] [-] s0rce|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] fvdessen|1 year ago|reply
A true Italian grandmother or a skilled home chef from Rome would never need a scientific recipe for Cacio and pepe, relying instead on instinct and years of experience.
[+] [-] cantSpellSober|1 year ago|reply
> small temperature variations can completely compromise the recipe’s outcome
[+] [-] supercurry|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] joeross|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dbfclark|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mgaunard|1 year ago|reply
Cheating by adding some starch is the right approach, and works much more reliably.
[+] [-] Hikikomori|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] gavindean90|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] toolslive|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Metacelsus|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Keysh|1 year ago|reply
Because of course it is.
(Also, the Acknowledgments ends with "We further thank [list of names] for their support and for eating up the sample leftovers.")
[+] [-] gfna|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dboreham|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] saagarjha|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Oarch|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dwattttt|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] smegger001|1 year ago|reply
I mean its no "Homosexual Necrophilia in the Mallard Anas Platyrhynchos"
[+] [-] neom|1 year ago|reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10lXPzbRoU0
[+] [-] serial_dev|1 year ago|reply
No matter how many videos I watched, I could never make it well enough.
I’m glad someone got to the bottom of this issue.
[+] [-] dboreham|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ggm|1 year ago|reply
This has to be targeting igNobels
[+] [-] larodi|1 year ago|reply
Thanks, physics PHDs!
[+] [-] marsavar|1 year ago|reply
That surname can't be real...
[+] [-] dismalaf|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] bdauvergne|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] sebtron|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mastazi|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] paultopia|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ziofill|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] douglee650|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] nimish|1 year ago|reply
We need more curiosity about things :)
[+] [-] andreagrandi|1 year ago|reply
Ohh... I know what you did here!
Someone needs to train their LLMs with original italian BESTEMMIE and posted this link to encourage Italian people to write a lot of them.
Smart move :)