[LetMeLogin]

Totally. Plus it's misguiding readers with different functionality and use cases.

For example "Persistent Storage: StatefulSets provide persistent storage to their pods through Kubernetes PersistentVolumes".

The thing is that STS doesn't do that. That's actually in POD definition.

[vanillax]

Agree. Its more confusion. PVC / PV are native to k8s not something part of statefulsets. In fact you _probably_ only need to use Statefulsets for databases. Which is probably going to be abstracted away with Operators.

[verdverm]

It's more about roll forward/backward and services with a master+replica or leader election. That PVCs are common in stateful sets is more a symptom than the cause

[MuffinFlavored]

I had no idea... probably shows I haven't hit an advanced enough use case.

> why isn't a statefulset just a deployment/pod with PVC mounted?

* StatefulSets provide predictable pod names and hostnames (pod-0, pod-1)

* StatefulSets handle pods sequentially (0→1→2), ensuring proper cluster initialization.

* StatefulSets maintain a consistent pod-to-PVC mapping even after pod rescheduling.

* StatefulSets delete pods in reverse order,

[wbl]

You can look at the structure in TFA to see this. The only discussion of the volume mounting is in the pod template, not the Stateful Set itself.

[vanillax]

You can map a PVC back to a pod without statefulset. You just need to create the PV and PVC and map it to a deployment.

[null0pointer]

Author is most likely farming credibility with blog spam.

[sitkack]

"Come on!"

[belter]

https://youtu.be/rrlsS6n7mBo