top | item 42630389 (no title) aperrien | 1 year ago While descriptive, I'd think a catchier name might be in order. As a plus, that can be used to draw people away from any Oracle branding. discuss order hn newest worthless-trash|1 year ago Just call it Browserscript, and be done with it. Call it what it is. nayuki|1 year ago But it's also Serverscript due to Node.js. thiht|1 year ago > Call it what it isNOT Browserscript then. JS moved beyond the browser almost 3 decades ago (rhino.jar, anyone?) and became mainstream on the server side almost a decade ago. load replies (1) thayne|1 year ago Or Webscript physicles|1 year ago ScriptyScript load replies (1) jppope|1 year ago ScriptyJava?
worthless-trash|1 year ago Just call it Browserscript, and be done with it. Call it what it is. nayuki|1 year ago But it's also Serverscript due to Node.js. thiht|1 year ago > Call it what it isNOT Browserscript then. JS moved beyond the browser almost 3 decades ago (rhino.jar, anyone?) and became mainstream on the server side almost a decade ago. load replies (1) thayne|1 year ago Or Webscript physicles|1 year ago ScriptyScript load replies (1) jppope|1 year ago ScriptyJava?
thiht|1 year ago > Call it what it isNOT Browserscript then. JS moved beyond the browser almost 3 decades ago (rhino.jar, anyone?) and became mainstream on the server side almost a decade ago. load replies (1)
worthless-trash|1 year ago
nayuki|1 year ago
thiht|1 year ago
NOT Browserscript then. JS moved beyond the browser almost 3 decades ago (rhino.jar, anyone?) and became mainstream on the server side almost a decade ago.
thayne|1 year ago
physicles|1 year ago
jppope|1 year ago