Marc Rogers appears to be a British national who was vacationing in the US, so it’s no surprise he didn’t have good healthcare insurance coverage.
I wonder if he has travel insurance or if he has a global healthcare plan. The article is vague about it. But it’s possible that his insurer isn’t even a US insurance company.
The cybersecurity community has rallied together to support Rogers' fundraiser, which at the time of writing has accrued just over $63,000 in donations, with just over half of the total sum raised so far.
The Register was hinting at how ridiculous the health insurance situation is, so, TL;DR of that aspect:
> [...] and nothing out of the ordinary showed up on a routine X-ray and an MRI wasn't possible due to insurance delays. [...] A week later, Rogers started losing some sensation in his hands and tried to have the MRI rescheduled, but the approval from his insurance company never came. [...] "Overnight I lost all sensation, all mobility, and became quadriplegic. [...] He begins a course of physical therapy today, but his insurance will only cover the first of three required weeks, [...]
In isolation, that last bit would only sound like normal unconscionable practices of a health insurance company. But in context of their prior shittiness resulting in great harm to the insured, it's like they're doubling-down. Are they so untouchable, that they don't have to care about optics?
I hope a really good lawyer contacts the victim, and they successfully sue the insurance company for a billion dollars. And that that provides a template for other victims to sue. A billion here, a billion there, and, pretty soon, and even the most sociopathic execs and boards have to start rethinking their practices.
Another poster here wrote that the profit margins at those companies are about 6%, and the overall costs on the order of 30%. Meaning that if the profit drops to zero, the health insurer could only pay for eight days instead of seven without raising premiums, and if the profit and total salaries drop to zero, only for about 11 days instead of seven. 11 is far from the needed 21.
If you want to blame someone, consider blaming the avaricious premium payers. And consider going easy on the blame. Blaming is easy but it makes you see people as avaricious when that's not reasonable.
USA reaping what it’s sown, we’ve had very viable healthcare candidates in the last 20 years and instead we’ve voted for hysteria and insurance industry friendly moderates.
Americans routinely voice their preferences for a system along the lines of "The Affordable Care Act" and their gross dissatisfaction at the abomination that is "Obama Care". Reforms are clearly needed.
This is not true. I'm getting tired of reading this kind of stuff on HN, maybe I should just ignore it but a few friends from other parts of the world, also HN readers, are starting to believe it... So I'll try doing my part.
Yes, the worst-case scenario for health expenses is indeed bad in the US, this is true. However, this is not the average healthcare experience. It's not a matter of time until you're slapped with a bankruptcy-level bill.
My wife and I, both in our 50s, have had our share of insurance annoyances and frustrating phone calls, but we've had multiple surgeries fully covered by insurance. And this is the same with friends and family members, including at least 4 cancer treatments that did not lead to bankruptcy-level or even truly notable bills. This anecdote includes many people who died of "old age".
Worst-case scenario bills can be bad elsewhere too. For instance, a friend in Europe had to do a 250K GoFundMe campaign to pay for a life-saving treatment for his daughter because well, the only place in the world that performed the surgery she needed was... Guess where? The US. He faced bankruptcy for this bill, but friends and strangers were able to help him out to an extent. I think he's still recovering from the expense years later.
Medical bankruptcies and financially crushing bills are a sad possibility in the US, and certainly much more likely than in most other places. We need to keep working on this. But the vast majority of people will not have to face this problem in their lifetimes.
[+] [-] chatmasta|1 year ago|reply
I wonder if he has travel insurance or if he has a global healthcare plan. The article is vague about it. But it’s possible that his insurer isn’t even a US insurance company.
Best wishes to him in his recovery.
[+] [-] difosfor|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mkesper|1 year ago|reply
https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-marc-rogers-road-to-recov...
[+] [-] dod9er|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] aestetix|1 year ago|reply
It seems like the only way to get health insurance in the US that actually helps you get health care is to get elected to Congress.
[+] [-] doubleg72|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] neilv|1 year ago|reply
> [...] and nothing out of the ordinary showed up on a routine X-ray and an MRI wasn't possible due to insurance delays. [...] A week later, Rogers started losing some sensation in his hands and tried to have the MRI rescheduled, but the approval from his insurance company never came. [...] "Overnight I lost all sensation, all mobility, and became quadriplegic. [...] He begins a course of physical therapy today, but his insurance will only cover the first of three required weeks, [...]
In isolation, that last bit would only sound like normal unconscionable practices of a health insurance company. But in context of their prior shittiness resulting in great harm to the insured, it's like they're doubling-down. Are they so untouchable, that they don't have to care about optics?
I hope a really good lawyer contacts the victim, and they successfully sue the insurance company for a billion dollars. And that that provides a template for other victims to sue. A billion here, a billion there, and, pretty soon, and even the most sociopathic execs and boards have to start rethinking their practices.
[+] [-] Arnt|1 year ago|reply
If you want to blame someone, consider blaming the avaricious premium payers. And consider going easy on the blame. Blaming is easy but it makes you see people as avaricious when that's not reasonable.
[+] [-] jack_the_dev|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] pluc|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] righthand|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] blitzar|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] glimshe|1 year ago|reply
Yes, the worst-case scenario for health expenses is indeed bad in the US, this is true. However, this is not the average healthcare experience. It's not a matter of time until you're slapped with a bankruptcy-level bill.
My wife and I, both in our 50s, have had our share of insurance annoyances and frustrating phone calls, but we've had multiple surgeries fully covered by insurance. And this is the same with friends and family members, including at least 4 cancer treatments that did not lead to bankruptcy-level or even truly notable bills. This anecdote includes many people who died of "old age".
Worst-case scenario bills can be bad elsewhere too. For instance, a friend in Europe had to do a 250K GoFundMe campaign to pay for a life-saving treatment for his daughter because well, the only place in the world that performed the surgery she needed was... Guess where? The US. He faced bankruptcy for this bill, but friends and strangers were able to help him out to an extent. I think he's still recovering from the expense years later.
Medical bankruptcies and financially crushing bills are a sad possibility in the US, and certainly much more likely than in most other places. We need to keep working on this. But the vast majority of people will not have to face this problem in their lifetimes.
[+] [-] zcrossing|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]