top | item 42631876

Donut Lab's next-generation in-wheel motors

70 points| klemola | 1 year ago |donutlab.com

39 comments

order

vlachen|1 year ago

I spent a number of years designing outer-runner direct drive permanent magnet motors for industrial equipment and I've got some questions.

Cheifly, bearings. They're not shown in any of the oh-wow images, but these will likely be the most expensive component of each motor. Big bearings are expensive, and to accept the loading of normal wheel operation, these will have to be pretty beefy. That's not even discussing operational life and maintenance.

After you've stuffed a pair of angular contact roller bearings into this "wheel", you're going to want to keep salt water and road grime from entering those bearings, so what do you use as a seal? Whatever you use is going to be big, expensive, and suck up huge amounts of power due to the large contact surface.

Finally, once you've got big ass bearings and big ass seals, how do you have enough room to put a decent amount of copper in there? Power in these things always amounts to maximizing the amount of copper in the space, and I just don't see room for it.

usrusr|1 year ago

The way I understand hubless wheel designs (powered or not) is that you don't build them as one big bearing, wasting huge amounts of load bearing capacity in all parts of the rotation that aren't the ground contact point. I assume that the moving part is the rim is designed as a rail, with tiny trucks (as in the rail car component) riding on it that are fixed to the non-moving part. You'd have a high density of strong trucks near the floor, some at the three and nine o'clock positions for braking and acceleration force and perhaps some flimsy guiding on top. Those trucks would not necessarily require more sealing (outside their own small bearings) than the rail/wheel contact in railroads need sealing. And moving that rail a little hubward, behind a lip that extends rimward would already get you strong centripetal forces driving out all ingress in contact with the moving part, and adding some overpressure (that you might need for cooling anyways) would help even more. I think it could all remain contactless on that first, whole-wheel level, at least if you don't design for routine wading.

anamax|1 year ago

Does "suck up huge amounts of power" for a seal imply "generate lots of heat"?

If so, is that heat another issue or is it a "don't care" because the heat is over a large enough surface?

Kelvin506|1 year ago

Plus there's the unsprung mass. At least traditionally part of suspension performance is reducing the unsprung mass as much as possible because mass and spring rate inversely correlate.

dscottboggs|1 year ago

At first I was like "this is crazy, those are going to be crazy expensive, they'll never make it" and then I realized we're not the customers, at least not willingly

https://www.donutdefence.com/

unwind|1 year ago

The Oruga Unitrack [1] is listed as one of their case-studies, it looks awesome and I would really like to see it move.

I found [2] on YouTube, but it doesn't seem to contain any actual video of the vehicle (and the voice-over says "unit-rack" rather than "uni-track" which I didn't love).

1: https://oruga.eu/#unitrack

2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clL4sDXxvWQ

lelanthran|1 year ago

Maybe they thought of this, but I didn't see any mitigation for the unsprung mass problem that these motors bring.

notjulianjaynes|1 year ago

If the weights are listed on the are to be believed, this shouldn't be an issue. It says 40 kg for a 21" wheel. A quick Google is telling me that a regular old steel wheel from a truck of the same size is around 50 to 80 lbs (23-36 kg).

That said, I was already thinking 630 kw per wheel was a pretty incredible claim before I realized these are apparently not much heavier than a non-mptorized wheel. These have to be some marketing department numbers or something. 630 kw is roughly 850 horsepower.

archontes|1 year ago

I'm thinking about the motorcycle motor. If they're really lighter than competing motors, I don't see the downside of using them like a traditional motor, taking the weight savings, putting it inside a sealed cavity, and coupling it to a driveshaft. Simplifies some of the other problems with sealing and bearings mentioned elsewhere, avoids unsprung mass.

exabrial|1 year ago

There's a concept called "unsprung mass", which basically destroys handling of all vehicles from race cars to trucks. Basically the greater the unsprung mass, the harder it is to damp the input into the suspension because of the inertia of the moving suspension components themselves. An ideal suspension has zero undamped mass, and all input to the suspension is a direct result of contact with the surface the vehicle is traveling on.

There is zero chance this tech will make it into sports cars unless it can beat the weight of a magnesium or AL alloy rim. Even casual vehicles like minivans have rim weight minimized for comfort.

Not an expert :) just watched enough Donut media on youtubes :P

JumpCrisscross|1 year ago

“The unsprung mass (colloquially unsprung weight) of a vehicle is the mass of the suspension, wheels or tracks (as applicable), and other components directly connected to them. This contrasts with the sprung mass (or weight) supported by the suspension, which includes the body and other components within or attached to it. Components of the unsprung mass include the wheel axles, wheel bearings, wheel hubs, tires, and a portion of the weight of driveshafts, springs, shock absorbers, and suspension links.

The unsprung mass of a typical wheel/tire combination represents a trade-off between the pair's bump-absorbing/road-tracking ability and vibration isolation.“

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsprung_mass

westmeal|1 year ago

One thing to add, while your wheels and tires are a big chunk of the weight here - you also have the uprights/knuckle and the wheel hub, bearing, brakes, rotor etc etc. All of that adds up quick. Most times if you are looking to reduce this on a car you will have the most gains (or losses haha) switching to an aftermarket wheel. No wonder the manufacturers slapped alloys on their cars too!

Neywiny|1 year ago

There's also the inertia problem where it's harder to accelerate mass that's further away from you. The classic spinning ice skater demo. This feels physically disadvantageous. Hopefully I'm wrong though, the more competition in spaces the better.

pbronez|1 year ago

Pretty powerful stuff. The Model Y Long Range AWD has a pair of motors that deliver Peak Power of 286 kW and Peak Torque of 510 N⋅m. Donut's claims their Automotive (21") motor can 2.2x the Power (630kW) and 8.4x the Torque (4300 Nm)

That's high enough that I have to assume it's for all four wheels... if it's for a single wheel, then an all wheel drive vehicle would have 2520Kw Power + 17,200 Nm Torque, which is 1.6x more than the most powerful production car in the world: the Lotus Evija (1,500 kW).

pbronez|1 year ago

This page [0] says "Donut Platform empowers hypercars [...] Delivering 1,500kW and 9,000Nm of total wheel torque, with acceleration from 0-100km/h in under 2 seconds"

I don't see how you go from a single 286kW/510Nm hub motor x4 gets you 1500kW/9000Nm instead of 2520Kw/17200Nm. Wonder what the limitations are + what nonsense they are trying to pull in their single motor stats.

[0] https://www.donutlab.com/industries/

tetris11|1 year ago

I guess I'm not really following. The engine's in the wheel?

klemola|1 year ago

Yeah. In fact, the article linked below[1] is more informative than the page I linked. TL;DR: there’s a big reduction to the overall weight of an EV using these, but they do add to the unsprung mass of the vehicle (the weight below suspension, as mentioned in another comment).

[1]: https://www.cnet.com/home/electric-vehicles/this-donut-shape...

xhkkffbf|1 year ago

Is the control of these things good enough that there's no need for a steering mechanism? Or I should say "mechanical steering". Devices like the Segway steer by changing the wheel speeds just a bit. Could this deliver enough control to steer well enough at highway speeds? I'm guessing it could work in a parking lot.

ungreased0675|1 year ago

Have they put one in a car yet? Maybe I’m a simple person, but the first thing I’d do if I was CEO of that company would be putting my ultra-powerful motors in a car and heading to the drag strip.

giantg2|1 year ago

I see how the one on the motorcycle looks. But why does the car and semi just look normal? I wonder what the bearing configuration looks like.

numpad0|1 year ago

Looks like one of many "shovels for gold diggers" unitized motors for robotic dogs and humanoids. There's been a lot of such compact all-in-one motor units from China lately.