[8dcc]

Yes, this is true. I didn't use that in the code because I thought it would make it less readable, though. I might mention it somewhere, thank you.

[cb321]

In many prog.lang's, it absolutely makes things less readable. This is not an accident, but because the PL itself specifically tries to syntactically support pointer types (i.e. to literally aid readability). Most PLs do so only for general purpose VMem pointers with user-defined pointers being afterthoughts (at best). You probably need (at least!) operator overloading to get the same level of readability as "PL-native" pointers { though "readability" is a bit subjective and powerful PL features can be divisive; Scare "quotes" for interpretation hazard :-) }.

Anyway, you probably knew all that & I don't mean to suggest otherwise, but it made sense to write since HN loves PL talk.