I was surprised she didn't have some kind of non-compete with Google, but they are illegal/unenforceable in CA, right? (I'm on the East Coast so pardon my lack of knowledge).
What if Sergei and Larry WANT her to go to Yahoo. Not to "compete" but to build it out in some other way, to build it as a service that google can then acquire.
She can go there to experiment on ideas that maybe even google had internally but couldn't risk to do with google viewers...
Non-competes are totally unenforceable in CA as a condition of employment. If you sell your startup to an acquirer, the contract can include a non-compete subject to fairly strict conditions of reasonableness.
This tagline is misleading. A single paragraph discusses "How Yahoo kept it all under wraps" while the rest of the article is an also-ran discussion about Mayer's potential success/failure at Yahoo.
[+] [-] stevencorona|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] samstave|13 years ago|reply
She can go there to experiment on ideas that maybe even google had internally but couldn't risk to do with google viewers...
[+] [-] saraid216|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rg|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] warech|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gringomorcego|13 years ago|reply
Until those companies apologize to every existing employee, I have absolutely no loyalty to them.
If they can't even let the free market decide the value of the programmer why should I have any fucking allegiance to any of them?
I can only hope she and others get the competitive salary they deserve.
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] dasil003|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] samstave|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adventureful|13 years ago|reply
You're talking about a regulated market in which labor is protected by government intervention from collusion between companies.
[+] [-] shellox|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]