I'd suggest browsing through ourworldindata.org's energy section. It is an absolutely astonishing accomplishment what China has built with slashing PV and battery prices as well as production capacities in recent years. Dynamics are such that there's hope they'll reach peak CO2 emissions in the upcoming few years, way ahead of their own plans. I'm saying that as a German whose 20y old idea (be a global supplier for renewable tech) they copied and executed like 10x better.
bgnn|1 year ago
JumpCrisscross|1 year ago
China doesn't want to rely on gas because they have to import it. They're fine relying on coal, which they can produce reliably, which is why they keep building coal-fired plants.
cbmuser|1 year ago
PicassoCTs|1 year ago
cbmuser|1 year ago
The country is expected to reach an installed nuclear capacity of 400 GW in 2060.
And, unlike wind and solar, nuclear power plants provide baseload and can actually drive an electricity grid.
toomuchtodo|1 year ago
Within the next ~14 months, the world will be deploying ~1TW/solar every year, ~200GW assuming 20% capacity factor for "apples to apples" comparison to thermal generation with a higher capacity factor. Compare to the rate of nuclear deployment and your 2060 figure, 35 years away.
> And, unlike wind and solar, nuclear power plants provide baseload and can actually drive an electricity grid.
There are numerous electrical grids in the world that operate without nuclear. There is minimum demand that needs to be met, but clearly nuclear isn't needed to do that (as evidenced by low carbon grids that operate without it).
https://e360.yale.edu/features/three-myths-about-renewable-e...
https://www.minister.industry.gov.au/ministers/husic/media-r...
https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/NYNu...
https://www.google.com/search?q=baseload+is+a+myth