• Game company signs deal with Microsoft to be a platform exclusive.
• Game company releases game with problems but has a successful launch.
• Game company complains that their original contract is bad, it would be fixed in an alternate world, and that they complain about paying to be a platform exclusive.If I didn't think Phil Fish was a drama queen before...
jblow|13 years ago
(And this is not to deny that Phil Fish tends to have a lot of drama. I am just saying that to anyone in the game industry this kind of armchair quarterbacking is obviously uninformed, and then seeing someone attacked / blamed / whatever due to the conclusions of said armchair quarterbacking is just pretty sad. Speaking as someone who has been through this himself on multiple occasions.)
CubicleNinjas|13 years ago
He made a bad deal and is blaming others. Had he not blamed Microsoft for the contract he signed I would completely understand his, very tough, decision.
"I guarantee Phil Fish knows a lot more about the facts of the situation than you do."
I should hope so! :)
cube13|13 years ago
This smells wrong. There's absolutely no benefit for the developer to release an exclusive game on a platform if the developer is paying the platform holder for the exclusive rights. The only way exclusivity benefits a developer is if the platform holder is paying them to stay exclusive.
jblow|13 years ago
unknown|13 years ago
[deleted]