This is a phone with a limited version of Android (Android Go) and only 2GB of RAM which isn't enough. It has a slow CPU, it lacks 5G connectivity which is more and more important just to have good reception. It comes with at most 2 years of security updates. It has 32GB of storage which quickly fill up if you take pictures every now and then.
These are recently released phones with 6GB RAM or more and Android 14+ starting at £99. 6GB of RAM means you can use your phone for a couple of years without it getting super slow.
Its limited for sure, but that may not be a problem for everyone. I've been using a Cat S22 flip phone without any real issue. It has a Snapdragon 215 and 2GB of RAM.
Don't get me wrong, the S22 is limited for sure and that's part of what I use it for (I need a rugged device to carry around our land, I don't need a glass slab). Android is noticeably slower than a more recent Pixel device but its totally usable.
You are ofcourse right that there are better specced devices in this price band. And HMD is one of the better respected mobile brands. Two GB is also good enough for basic telephony (calls, messaging, video chats etc.) and for various kinds of "consumption" (music, youtube, browsing etc.). Many popular older apps can run fine on it too. Honestly, when Android 5 - 8 could run on 1 GB or less, on single or dual core cpus, quite well, I don't frankly understand how we've come to this point that we now need a new OS (Android Go) to run on "limited resources" devices that have more ram and cpu (cores) ...
I think the issue with these low end devices are that the duopoly on operating systems makes it impossible to develop a competing operating system that get's any traction.
I am 100% sure you, as a manufacturer, could develop a very lightweight shim over a linux or BSD kernel that has significantly better performance than Android does. It would however be a universal flop regardless of how useable it is since critical apps like WhatsApp/Telegram/banking would not get ported to that platform ever.
That effectively leaves you with needing a capable web browser and well... Even Firefox with every form of adblocker enable regularly chews up 2-3 GB of ram for me, at least on desktop. And building a competitive web browser to Chromium is an absurd endeavour for a cheap cell manufacturer.
I tried a relatively cheap nokia android phone a couple years ago and I'll never do it again. The camera would do this thing where you would take a photo, the screen would show that the shutter had snapped, but your actual photo would be whatever was happening a second later. I ended up with 10% of my photos being a blurry picture of the floor.
Yup.. and in some of the cheaper phones I have tried out, there was a mismatch with camera flash timing and when the phone actually captured the image.. it didn't happen in the main camera app but happened in every other app.. so most of my night pictures were just black... It would have been nicer if there were fewer android phones around so the manufacturers actually spend time testing them out..
> availability of operating system upgrades [..] at least 5 years from the date of the end of placement on the market of the last unit of a product model
would be nice if the EU would mandate something like lineage os being available from day 1 for a device. manufacturer would have to provide resources to make sure it works before release.
> Using memory extension (virtual RAM) requires enough storage space. To protect the storage, memory extension is automatically and permanently disabled once 90% of the usage limit is reached.
So you get to 90% (of 32GB) one time, and swap no longer works even if you clear space?
It's a shame we haven't figured out how to do "modular" smartphones where the motherboard can be swapped out, like with framework laptops. I'd be happy with a phone from 10 years ago on all axes except CPU/GPU/RAM and corresponding security updates.
Google's Project Ara was this. A modular smartphone where you could swap any component out with plug-in modules.
I met a Google employee at a conference in 2016 and he let me play with his Ara for a bit. It felt fantastic. I'd have bought one in an instant.
Google cancelled the project.
I do wonder about the longevity of such a device. I still have all my Android phones from the very first HTC G1 and anything with a removable component feels pretty rattly now.
When Nokia 5110 were on the market and you'd owned one for a while, you needed to pack the battery with double sided tape so the contacts didn't disconnect, causing the phone to power off.
I guess that sort of thing is why Google binned the idea.
I think modularity made more sense in an area where significant performance gains happened in hardware every 6 months. It makes very little sense with a 6+ year horizon -- at that point you're upgrading everything anyway.
Now, modularity is really a right-to-repair issue, not anything that provides a meaningful benefit to upgrading. And for that things just need to be "modular" enough to repair by a specialist.
Let alone user swappable soc and ram.. we even lost the modularity that came with micro sdcards and user replaceable batteries in so most phones these days...
Destined to become immediate e-waste like all the other phones in its class. Wanna bet that it can only run 32-bit apps despite having a 64-bit CPU, because it's so memory-starved? That's extremely common in this segment.
The “Upgrade without overspending” pitch is rather bizarre considering that the specs on low-end phones seemingly do not change. Five years ago they were selling four very slow Cortex-A53 cores with 2GB of RAM, today they are selling four very slow Cortex-A53 cores with 2GB of RAM, in five years the phone manufacturers will have somehow continued twisting Google's hand to be able to continue selling four very slow Cortex-A53 cores with 2GB of RAM.
I truly feel sorry for those that will use this phone for anything that is not just calling and writing sms. I've had relatives with slow phones, and especially if old and not tech savvy, they click, wait, click again because nothing happened. Then, the feedback of the first click arrives, but the 2nd click will now click something different because what is being displayed has now changed. So they go back, but it's so slow they have to wait and press back again (...). And so, the eternal cycle of slow mobile phones restarts
What happened to RAM use? Ignoring gaming (which a large sunbset of the market never ever does), phones these days are doing exactly the same things they were doing back when 512MB was considered a generous amount of RAM. It feels as if Google deliberately ended all RAM frugality in platform updates to get ever bigger ad delivery machines into pockets.
Actually this is a place that is open to anyone's opinion - and that makes sense. People from border areas with the one of the discussion can give alternative insights. Of course digging relevant ones out of 1k comments are a challenge.
I wouldn't want to use this as my main device, but I might get one just to use as the display for a DJI controller. At the moment I'm using an old Samsung S8 with a burnt-in screen and no updates.
A Redmi 14C offers 4GB RAM, MTK G81 SoC, for 499 CNY (about 66 EUR, slightly more expensive than the HMD one) in China.
It would be a strong competitor if it's that cheap in Europe as well, but sadly no. The price is almost doubled. That said, it's still a phone you shouldn't buy if you can afford a better one.
Where did all small budget phones had gone? I don't need a tablet that does not fit anywhere and has huge camera bump that does not lie flat on the table.
[+] [-] Tepix|1 year ago|reply
If you can afford it, get something like the Samsung A52 5G with 7 years of updates and 6GB or 8GB of RAM. If that's too expensive, get one from the list when it's on sale: https://skinflint.co.uk/?cat=umtsover&v=e&hloc=uk&sort=p&bl1...
These are recently released phones with 6GB RAM or more and Android 14+ starting at £99. 6GB of RAM means you can use your phone for a couple of years without it getting super slow.
[+] [-] _heimdall|1 year ago|reply
Don't get me wrong, the S22 is limited for sure and that's part of what I use it for (I need a rugged device to carry around our land, I don't need a glass slab). Android is noticeably slower than a more recent Pixel device but its totally usable.
[+] [-] thisislife2|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] amelius|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] aitchnyu|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] saagarjha|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] jpc0|1 year ago|reply
I am 100% sure you, as a manufacturer, could develop a very lightweight shim over a linux or BSD kernel that has significantly better performance than Android does. It would however be a universal flop regardless of how useable it is since critical apps like WhatsApp/Telegram/banking would not get ported to that platform ever.
That effectively leaves you with needing a capable web browser and well... Even Firefox with every form of adblocker enable regularly chews up 2-3 GB of ram for me, at least on desktop. And building a competitive web browser to Chromium is an absurd endeavour for a cheap cell manufacturer.
[+] [-] pbhjpbhj|1 year ago|reply
I thought it was something like a YubiKey, but it appears instead to be a really cheap phone running Android Go.
[+] [-] seanalltogether|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] saidinesh5|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] brightball|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] hddherman|1 year ago|reply
That's a criminally short support period, and a great way to produce even more e-waste.
[+] [-] flas9sd|1 year ago|reply
https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/...
> availability of operating system upgrades [..] at least 5 years from the date of the end of placement on the market of the last unit of a product model
[+] [-] madeofpalk|1 year ago|reply
> ²From the global launch date of HMD Key.
So if you buy it in 12 months time it'll only recieve 1 year of security updates.
How long do you reckon this will be on the market for?
[+] [-] asadhaider|1 year ago|reply
The about us page even states "We make phones that last for years" as their company quest[0].
[0] https://www.hmd.com/en_int/about
[+] [-] exe34|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] politelemon|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ptx|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] hulitu|1 year ago|reply
No. Sincerely, GCHQ.
[+] [-] commandersaki|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mkl|1 year ago|reply
They also have this footnote:
> Using memory extension (virtual RAM) requires enough storage space. To protect the storage, memory extension is automatically and permanently disabled once 90% of the usage limit is reached.
So you get to 90% (of 32GB) one time, and swap no longer works even if you clear space?
[+] [-] unsupp0rted|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] throwaway519|1 year ago|reply
That's a budget phone. Seems a better bang all around for the extra £6.
[+] [-] scrlk|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Retr0id|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] suprjami|1 year ago|reply
I met a Google employee at a conference in 2016 and he let me play with his Ara for a bit. It felt fantastic. I'd have bought one in an instant.
Google cancelled the project.
I do wonder about the longevity of such a device. I still have all my Android phones from the very first HTC G1 and anything with a removable component feels pretty rattly now.
When Nokia 5110 were on the market and you'd owned one for a while, you needed to pack the battery with double sided tape so the contacts didn't disconnect, causing the phone to power off.
I guess that sort of thing is why Google binned the idea.
[+] [-] mtmail|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mjburgess|1 year ago|reply
Now, modularity is really a right-to-repair issue, not anything that provides a meaningful benefit to upgrading. And for that things just need to be "modular" enough to repair by a specialist.
[+] [-] saidinesh5|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] TazeTSchnitzel|1 year ago|reply
Destined to become immediate e-waste like all the other phones in its class. Wanna bet that it can only run 32-bit apps despite having a 64-bit CPU, because it's so memory-starved? That's extremely common in this segment.
The “Upgrade without overspending” pitch is rather bizarre considering that the specs on low-end phones seemingly do not change. Five years ago they were selling four very slow Cortex-A53 cores with 2GB of RAM, today they are selling four very slow Cortex-A53 cores with 2GB of RAM, in five years the phone manufacturers will have somehow continued twisting Google's hand to be able to continue selling four very slow Cortex-A53 cores with 2GB of RAM.
[+] [-] amarcheschi|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mherkender|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ZiiS|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] usrusr|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] bobmcnamara|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] wormik|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] szundi|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] beefnugs|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] YoooThere|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] throwaway55479|1 year ago|reply
FYI, You can now have 6 years of major android upgrades for 200$ with the A16 [1]
[1] https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=13346&idPhone...
[+] [-] Retr0id|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] hulitu|1 year ago|reply
That's what Play Store is for.
[+] [-] KeplerBoy|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] hulitu|1 year ago|reply
Aren't there any poor in Britain ?
[+] [-] fuzzfactor|1 year ago|reply
That's a pretty low price but outside of UK and AU, only available in the "newest" of Zealands ;)
[+] [-] cyp0633|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] butz|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] lifestyleguru|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mjd|1 year ago|reply
Is there a similar product that works in the USA?
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]