[smcnally]

> I'm not sure this is grounded in reality. We've already seen articles related to how OpenAI is behind schedule with GPT-5.

Progress by Google, meta, Microsoft, Qwen and Deepseek is unhampered by OpenAI’s schedule. Their latest — including Gemini 2.0, Llama 3.3, Phi 4 — and the coding fine tunes that follow are all pretty good.

[sdesol]

> unhampered by OpenAI’s schedule

Sure, but if the advancements are to catch up to OpenAI, then major improvements by other vendors are nice and all, but I don't believe that was what the commenter was implying. Right now the leaders in my opinion are OpenAI and Anthropic and unless they are making major improvements every few months, the industry as a whole is not making major improvements.

[smcnally]

OpenAI and Anthropic are definitely among the leaders. Playing catch-up to these leaders' mind-share and technology is some of the motivation for others. Calling the progress being made in the space by Google (Gemini), MSFT (Phi), Meta (llama), Alibaba (Qwen) "nice and all" is a position you might be pleasantly surprised to reconsider if this technology interests you. And don't sleep on Apple and AMZ -

In the space covered by Tabby, Copilot, aider, Continue and others, capabilities continue to improve considerably month-over-month.

In the segments of the industry I care most about, I agree 100% with what the commenter said w/r/t expecting major improvements every few months. Pay even passing attention to huggingface and github and see work being done by indies as well as corporate behemoths happening at breakneck pace. Some work is pushing the SOTA. Some is making the SOTA more widely available. Lots of it is different approaches to solving similar challenges. Most of it benefits consumers and creators looking use and learn from all of this.