(no title)
guardiangod | 1 year ago
The explanation I read online is that Translink (the transport authority) lost one of the 2 rail grinders they contracted, and had to buy a grinder for use. So for a few years, while waiting for the grinder to arrive, the rails were not getting the regular grinding needed that'd lessen the wheels-on-rail noise.
An unverified rumor I heard was that Translink cheaped out and bought a batch of substandard rails that are softer than needed. This means the rails wear out and become out of spec faster. The issue was compounded by the fact that the softer rails were used to replace a large portions of routes with sharp curves.
The rolling stocks use linear induction propulsion, which means there is no electric motor on the train. The trains are very light as a result and require different maintenance.
xattt|1 year ago
A few thoughts:
The downside to LIMs is that they have ann unexpected derailment/failure mode (1), as manifested by the 2023 SRT derailment.
Briefly, the magnetic repulsion/attraction forces of an accelerating train caused a section of the reaction rail to catch on the train, which catapulted a train car.
I’ll also mention used to live near the SRT. They were still great and quirky around the 10 year mark. However, the Mark Is didn’t age well. They just got louder and louder.
They also became more and more susceptible to severe weather, to the point they were run in manual mode (versus ATO) with every snow storm.
(1) https://stevemunro.ca/2024/01/31/the-scarborough-rt-derailme...
rob74|1 year ago
Doxin|1 year ago
shiroiushi|1 year ago
This sentence makes no sense at all. A linear induction motor is a type of electric motor.
wesapien|1 year ago
PeterStuer|1 year ago