[eacapeisfutuile]

That is not why neither Bazel or Buck was created.

[SuperSandro2000]

Bazel is the bane of my existence. I have never seen such an anti distro tool that is so hostile against your system libraries.

[eddd-ddde]

That's the whole point, you can't rely on systems for hermetic builds.

[ycombinatrix]

Bazel was built for reproducible builds. Meaning it literally exists to compile stuff without using your rando sus system libraries.

[pkkm]

It's not? I recall reading that coping with a variety of languages was one of the main motivations, but do correct me if I'm wrong and you have a citation.

[eacapeisfutuile]

They do hermetic builds so that it is viable at large scale via granular caching. They were made to make that work at those scales, with pretty much zero consideration for any external package managers or anything like that