top | item 42735546

(no title)

DLoupe | 1 year ago

Why $6,2999 when the article says he payed around $900?

discuss

order

phony-account|1 year ago

> Why $6,2999 when the article says he payed around $900?

In the fifth paragraph:

“Admittedly, it did not cost me the $6300 from the article's title, much closer to $900. Nonetheless, everything I'm describing translates to every other Canon camera model!”

thatBilly|1 year ago

He discovered this information about his $900 camera but has found that it also applies to other models, likely the Canon EOS-1D X Mark III.

KomoD|1 year ago

Because it gets more clicks.

tobyhinloopen|1 year ago

He likely bought an old model second-hand :)

Edit: The camera he uses is a 2019 pocket camera. The 6299 must be another model that has the same restrictions.