[haffi112]

The original website is a news report of an article. The one he posted is from a peer-reviewed journal which has a much higher standard of reporting. The information there is reported by scientists with expertise in the field. You cannot expect the same level of rigour from journalists that try to sensationalise findings to get more clicks.

[OutOfHere]

News articles have a valid purpose of popularizing journal articles for the vast majority of people who will feel lost looking at a journal article directly.

A news article should be compared to another news article, not to a journal article. A journal article can however be compared with another journal article.

I understand that the journal article you linked might be superior.