There is one caveat, though: it is not open source as advertised.
> In the event of a conflict, these provisions shall take precedence over those in the Apache License:
> Restriction on Resale: The multi-node support, Docker Compose file support, Preview Deployments and Multi Server features cannot be sold or offered as a service by any party other than the copyright holder without prior written consent.
> Modification Distribution: Any modifications to the multi-node support, Docker Compose file support, Preview Deployments and Multi Server features must be distributed freely and cannot be sold or offered as a service.
The author has seemed oblivious to the difference in past discussions - to the point of deleting issues asking for the description to be changed (https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/issues/82 - unfortunately not archived on Wayback).
The fact they're still advertising it as "Open source", even now is astonishing and are clearly just using it as a marketing point and are not interested in it in reality.
Docker swarm underneath. Id rather not build on top of anything that is swarm.
Nothing against it per se but just not confident in its longevity. I know people still have it deployed and seem happy but swarm subreddit has a post every two weeks
> Managed Hosting: No need to manage your own servers
> 1 Servers (You bring the servers)
Hmm, am I out of touch, or wouldn't "managed hosting" imply I don't bring the servers?
Then the "Free plan" says "Manager your own infrastructure installing dokploy ui in your own server", which sounds the same as the paid plan, except without support I guess?
I think if it was a bit more clear what "Managed hosting" means in this case, the pricing would make somewhat more sense. Right now I wouldn't even understand what I was paying for, if "Bring your own servers" is already free.
So this is a similar model to Coolify, which seems to be a direct competitor. In fact, it looks VERY similar to Coolify, even down to the menus and menu structure.
I'd be interested to see a side by side comparison of the two platforms.
As I understand it, Dokploy Cloud [https://docs.dokploy.com/docs/core/cloud] makes the hosting "managed" by removing the need for Dokploy UI to be installed on your own VPS. With the free/open source version you need to host the UI yourself.
The first thing I checked was serverless support, and was pleasently surprised by having containers support instead of the constrained set of options of Vercel and Nelify, not exposing the underlying AWS Lambda capabilities.
Although this solution is as cool as Coolify and will probably improve in the future, I still prefer to Dockerize my applications because, after that, switching between cloud providers becomes easy.
For personal projects, I’ve fallen for the simplicity of Kamal. Created to host Ruby in Rails apps from DHH and the team who run Hey and Basecamp, Kamal is web framework agnostic. The demo is hosting a go app. Works great on a Pi.
From my understanding, localstack is for emulating actual AWS resources locally, so you can develop without relying on their cloud services. It's not intended to be used in production.
maxloh|1 year ago
> In the event of a conflict, these provisions shall take precedence over those in the Apache License:
> Restriction on Resale: The multi-node support, Docker Compose file support, Preview Deployments and Multi Server features cannot be sold or offered as a service by any party other than the copyright holder without prior written consent.
> Modification Distribution: Any modifications to the multi-node support, Docker Compose file support, Preview Deployments and Multi Server features must be distributed freely and cannot be sold or offered as a service.
https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/blob/canary/LICENSE.MD
milliams|1 year ago
The fact they're still advertising it as "Open source", even now is astonishing and are clearly just using it as a marketing point and are not interested in it in reality.
Havoc|1 year ago
Nothing against it per se but just not confident in its longevity. I know people still have it deployed and seem happy but swarm subreddit has a post every two weeks
taylodl|1 year ago
diggan|1 year ago
> 1 Servers (You bring the servers)
Hmm, am I out of touch, or wouldn't "managed hosting" imply I don't bring the servers?
Then the "Free plan" says "Manager your own infrastructure installing dokploy ui in your own server", which sounds the same as the paid plan, except without support I guess?
I think if it was a bit more clear what "Managed hosting" means in this case, the pricing would make somewhat more sense. Right now I wouldn't even understand what I was paying for, if "Bring your own servers" is already free.
d1sxeyes|1 year ago
I'd be interested to see a side by side comparison of the two platforms.
slowwriter|1 year ago
9rx|1 year ago
pjmlp|1 year ago
Already there some plus points.
DaveMcMartin|1 year ago
ewalk153|1 year ago
https://kamal-deploy.org/
drchiu|1 year ago
shaiguitar|1 year ago
ctm92|1 year ago
surrTurr|1 year ago
[1]: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1
madeofpalk|1 year ago
higeorge13|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]