[sdflhasjd]

I remember removing the IR filter from a cheap webcam and seeing everything in a new light (haha, pun intended) was fascinating. One of my black coats that didn't get hot under the sun and appeared more reflective and. I remember some opaque things like Coke being much more translucent.

These winning photos are a bit boring my comparison, the ghostly effect of foliage in IR is cool but a bit overdone when there's so many and there were so many other interesting differences in every day objects.

I'd love to do the same with my mirrorless camera but it's a quite destructive operation.

[MisterTea]

> I remember some opaque things like Coke being much more translucent.

Many years ago (around 1998 or so) there was a Sony Camcorder which lacked or had the ability to have its IR filter removed. That supposedly gave it the ability to "see through" clothing which caused quite the uproar.

I bought one of those Flir One Pro IR cameras and bought it to a friends party. One thing that we were surprised about was that it could see clear through latex balloons.

[krisoft]

> One thing that we were surprised about was that it could see clear through latex balloons.

This was something which surprised me too. Not specifically latex, but how many manufactured materials appear to be transparent in IR.

The explanation I heard is that it is because dye manufacturers usually want to make their product keep their colour long even when exposed to direct sunlight. And the easiest way to achieve that is by selecting materials which are transparent in IR. If they weren't the absorbed IR energy would break them down faster.

So people usually don't care about the IR opaqueness of their pigments/dyes but they care about colour fastness. And that is what selects for IR transparency.

[archerx]

I had one those Sony camcorders, it’s night shot was insane. It could see through skin as well revealing vein structure in a lot of detail.