top | item 42799388

Apache Iceberg

207 points| jacobmarble | 1 year ago |iceberg.apache.org

66 comments

order

mritchie712|1 year ago

If you're looking to give Iceberg a spin, here's how to get it running locally, on AWS[0] and on GCP[1]. The posts use DuckDB as the query engine, but you could swap in Trino (or even chdb / clickhouse).

0 - https://www.definite.app/blog/cloud-iceberg-duckdb-aws

1 - https://www.definite.app/blog/cloud-iceberg-duckdb

romperstomper|1 year ago

you can just use iceberg tables with AWS Glue/Athena

dm03514|1 year ago

I think iceberg solves a lot of big data problems, for handling huge amounts of data on blob storage, including partitioning, compaction and ACID semantics.

I really like the way the catalog standard can decouple underlying storage as well.

My biggest concern is how inaccessible the implementations are, Java / spark has the only mature implementation right now,

Even DuckDB doesn’t support writing yet.

I built out a tool to stream data to iceberg which uses the python iceberg client:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/streaming-iceberg-using-sqlfl...

gopalv|1 year ago

Hidden partitioning is the most interesting Iceberg feature, because most of the very large datasets are timeseries fact tables.

I don't remember seeing that in Delta Lake [1], which is probably because the industry standard benchmarks use date as a column (tpc-h) or join date as a dimension table (tpc-ds) and do not use timestamp ranges instead of dates.

[1] - https://github.com/delta-io/delta/issues/490

fiddlerwoaroof|1 year ago

Delta Lake now has Hilbert-curve based clustering which solves a lot of the downsides of hive partitioning

teleforce|1 year ago

Apache Iceberg is one of the emerging Open Table Formats in addition to Delta Lake and Apache Hudi [1].

[1] Open Table Formats:

https://www.starburst.io/data-glossary/open-table-formats/

Icathian|1 year ago

I think this mischaracterizes the state of the space. Iceberg is the winner of this competition, as of a few months ago. All major vendors who didn't directly invent one of the others now support iceberg or have announced plans to do so.

Building lakehouse products on any table format but iceberg starting now seems to me like it must be a mistake.

jl6|1 year ago

The table on that page makes it look like all three of these are very similar, with schema evolution and partition evolution being the key differences. Is that really it?

I’d also love to see a good comparison between “regular” Iceberg and AWS’s new S3 Tables.

volderette|1 year ago

How do you query your iceberg tables? We are looking into moving away from Bigquery and Starrocks [1] looks like a good option.

[1] https://www.starrocks.io/

mritchie712|1 year ago

right now, starrocks or trino are likely your best options, but all the major query engines (clickhouse, snowflake, databricks, even duckdb) are improving their support too.

jl6|1 year ago

Why away from bigquery? Just wondering if it’s a cost thing.

crorella|1 year ago

What I like about iceberg is that the partitions of the tables are not tightly coupled to the subfolder structure of the storage layer (at least logically, at the end of the day the partitions are still subfolders with files), but at least the metadata is not tied to that, so you can change the partition of the tables going forward and still query a mix of old and new partitions time ranges.

In the other hand, since one of the use cases they created it at Netflix was to consume directly from real time systems, the management of the file creation when updates to the data is less trivial (the CoW vs MoR problem and how to compact small files) which becomes important on multi-petabytes tables with lots of users and frequent updates. This is something I assume not a lot companies put a lot of attention to (heck, not even at Netflix) and have big performance and cost implications.

varsketiz|1 year ago

I'm somewhat surprised to see it here - Iceberg is around for some time already.

benjaminwootton|1 year ago

It’s been on the up in recent years though as it appears to have won the format wars. Every vendor is rallying around it and there were new open source catalogues and support from AWS at the end of 2024.

mrbluecoat|1 year ago

Yeah, I was confused as well. It was like seeing "postage stamps" on the HN front page.

nikolatt|1 year ago

I've been looking at Iceberg for a while, but in the end went with Delta Lake because it doesn't have a dependency on a catalog. It also has good support for reading and writing from it without needing Spark.

Does anyone know if Iceberg has plans to support similar use cases?

pammf|1 year ago

Iceberg has the hdfs catalog, which also relies only on dirs and files.

That said, a catalog (which Delta also can have) helps a lot to keep things tidy. For example, I can write a dataset with Spark, transform it with dbt and a query engine (such as Trino) and consume the resulting dataset with any client that supports Iceberg. If I use a catalog, all happens without having to register the dataset location in each of these components.

mritchie712|1 year ago

Why don't you want a catalog? The SQL or REST catalogs are pretty light to set up. I have my eye on lakekeeper[0], but Polaris (from Snowflake) is a good option too.

PyIceberg is likely the easiest way to write without Spark.

0 - https://github.com/lakekeeper/lakekeeper

apwell23|1 year ago

I am stockholder in snowflake and iceberg's ascendance seems to coincide with snow's downfall.

Is the query engine value add justify snowflake's valuation. Their data marketplace thing didn't seem to have actually worked.

jaakl|1 year ago

I’m doing datalake modernization for medium-large enterprise and spent last months in sales calls of MS Fabric vs Snowflake vs Databricks. All fun, but now with the managed Iceberg in AWS (S3 tables) I tend to consider to choose none of them: just plain Iceberg is good enough. Of course someone needs to write and read it; but there are so many good free options already, even build does not feel scary. So I would go to the short side in Snowflake in medium-long term (looking their current value prop at least). Databricks has maybe more future as it has ML/AI-first approach. In short term we might still start with SF (with its Iceberg features), as the alternative future stack needs to mature and establish a bit.

mkl95|1 year ago

Iceberg on S3 tables is going to be a hot topic in the next few years.

npalli|1 year ago

Are there robust non-JVM based implementations for Iceberg currently? Sorry to say, but recommending JVM ecosystems around large data just feels like professional malpractice at this point. Whether deployment complexity, resource overhead, tool sprawl or operational complexity the ecosystem seems to attract people who solve only 50% of the problem and have another tool to solve the rest, which in turn only solves 50% etc.. ad infinitum. The popularity of solutions like Snowflake, Clickhouse, or DuckDB is not an accident and is the direction everything should go. I hear Snowflake will adopt this in the future, that is good news.

juunpp|1 year ago

> who solve only 50% of the problem and have another tool to solve the rest, which in turn only solves 50% etc.. ad infinitum

This actually converges to 1:

1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + ... = 1

You just need 30kloc of maven in your pom before you get there.

chehai|1 year ago

In order to get good query performance from Iceberg, we have to run compaction frequently. Compaction turns out to be very expensive. Any tip to minimize compaction while keeping queries fast?

vonnik|1 year ago

Curious to what extent Iceberg enables data composability and what the best complements and alternatives are.

lmm|1 year ago

Delta Lake is the main competitor. There's a lot of convergence going on, because everyone wants a common format and it's pretty clear what the desirable features are. Ultimately it becomes just boring infrastructure IMO.

nxm|1 year ago

It allows you to be query engine agnostic - query the same data via Spark, Snowflake or Trino. Granted, performance may suffer vs Snowflake internal tables somewhat due to certain performance optimizations not being there.

jmakov|1 year ago

Why would one choose this instead of DeltaLake?

jeffhuys|1 year ago

Looks good, but come on… at least try to open your website on a mobile device.

malnourish|1 year ago

It loads poorly and causes my 3080 to turn on its fan when I load it in up-to-date Firefox on Windows.

dangoodmanUT|1 year ago

iceberg is plauged with the problems it tries to solve, like being too tied to spark just to write data

apwell23|1 year ago

huh what? We use iceberg extensively, never used spark.

honestSysAdmin|1 year ago

Iceberg is a pretty cool guy, he consolidates the Parquet and doesn't afraid of anything.

rubenvanwyk|1 year ago

And yet there's still no straightforward way to write directly to Iceberg tables from Javascript as far as I know.

Rhubarrbb|1 year ago

Writing to catalogs is still pretty new. Databricks has recently been pushing delta-kernel-rs that DuckDb has a connector set up for, and there’s support for writing via Python with the Polars package through delta-rs. For small-time developers this has been pretty helpful for me and influential in picking delta lake over iceberg.

enether|1 year ago

for some reason it's really cumbersome to access this tech

nxm|1 year ago

What’s your use case? Iceberg is meant for analytical workloads