top | item 42814098

(no title)

lexlambda | 1 year ago

Important to note:

> Although the survey is not statistically representative of Nature readers or the scientific community at large

I found that the survey seems to have been advertised for with "Has Bluesky replaced X for scientists?" according to this article from Jan 14 [1]. This attracts people who switched more I think. So the 70% figure is nothing than hot air.

It is still interesting seeing the positive sentiments and reasons for switching analyzed.

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00037-y

discuss

order

No comments yet.