You are wrong, something that you could have easily checked yourself. There are many sophisticated epidemiology groups throughout defense and intelligence. It is a longstanding critical part of their mission, for a variety of end purposes.
While I am very skeptical of the lab leak hypothesis as an infectious disease epidemiologist, the DoE has a fair amount of expertise via the national labs.
My priors include all the agencies (the Intelligence Community, arguably the deep state) having ulterior political and personal motives. Does noone remember the Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction hoax that the CIA cooked up for GWB?
I would not trust any of these agencies to provide objective findings or conclusions, there is a lot of power on the table that's at stake.
The CIA did not cook up the Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction hoax. Paul Wolfowitz had to create an entirely new intelligence agency with hand-picked analysts to get that result, because the existing agencies refused to make that claim.
My prior includes neither agency can provide genetic analysis which would be the easiest way to convince a professor of virology that this theory has any merit.
jandrewrogers|1 year ago
Fomite|1 year ago
oa335|1 year ago
Dalewyn|1 year ago
I would not trust any of these agencies to provide objective findings or conclusions, there is a lot of power on the table that's at stake.
the_why_of_y|1 year ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Special_Plans
Paradigma11|1 year ago
ioulaum|1 year ago
The intelligence networks there were weak, and if people were talking about it, they may have assumed wrongly that there was something there.
Politicians hunting for excuses to do what they already want to do though, is definitely a thing.
tucnak|1 year ago
calf|1 year ago
User23|1 year ago
It's obviously false if you just think about it, but you can also do some searching if you need some authority to tell you.