All these "OpenAI has no moat" arguments will only make sense whenever there's a material, observable (as in not imaginary), shift on their market share.
The same one that underpins the entire existence of a little company called Spotify: I'm just too lazy to cancel my subscription and move to a newer player.
Not exactly a good sign for OpenAI considering Spotify has no power to increase prices enough such that it can earn a decent profit. Spotify’s potential is capped at whatever Apple/Amazon/Alphabet let them earn.
xxpor|1 year ago
Brands are incredibly powerful when talking about consumer goods.
bpt3|1 year ago
Your analogy is valid at this time, but proves the GP's point, not yours.
eikenberry|1 year ago
talldayo|1 year ago
AdSense
ttoinou|1 year ago
moralestapia|1 year ago
This broken record again.
Just observe reality. OpenAI is leading, by far.
All these "OpenAI has no moat" arguments will only make sense whenever there's a material, observable (as in not imaginary), shift on their market share.
roncesvalles|1 year ago
The same one that underpins the entire existence of a little company called Spotify: I'm just too lazy to cancel my subscription and move to a newer player.
lotsofpulp|1 year ago
aurareturn|1 year ago
Late in 2024, OpenAI had $3.7b in revenue. Meanwhile, Claude’s mobile app hit $1 million in revenue around the same time.
apwell23|1 year ago
Where do they report these ?
edit i found it here https://www.cnbc.com/2024/09/27/openai-sees-5-billion-loss-t...
"OpenAI sees roughly $5 billion loss this year on $3.7 billion in revenue"
pradn|1 year ago
ChatGPT is still vastly more popular than other, similar chat bots.
kpennell|1 year ago
ransom1538|1 year ago
qingcharles|1 year ago
ChatGPT is somewhat less censored (certainly on topics painful to the CCP), and GPT is multi-modal, which is a big selling point.
Depends on your use-case, of course.
ed|1 year ago
kgc|1 year ago