[strobeflier]

Come on. Which do you think is more likely, that it was a normal EOY sale of a lucrative stock, or that they sold based on insider info obtained weeks before anyone else?

[mrbungie]

Parent never suggested it was due to DeepSeek specifically, but for supossedly structural reasons if you follow the first paragraph.

I'm just calling out that "last year" wasn't really "last year" if you follow that argument.

[suraci]

i think it's insider trading, but not about deepseek, deepseek is never the main cause

deepseek v2 showed effeciency months ago, and nothing happened, there's also nothing happened after v3 and r1 release

the insider info is about when will Wall Street stop pushing and squeezing the market and start harvesting, and, IMO, this will happen anytime after rotation of ruling parties

i don't know if the similar scene happened before in the US, but this happened elsewhere, the rulling party with connected market makers and puppet central bank, push the market to highest and let it freely fall after rotation

nancy definetly know what the timing is

Just some nonsense, but if I’m right, it won’t take too long to witness it happen.

[throwmeme888]

it was 2-3 days after deepseek paper release on Christmas Day. I read this paper too and drew the exact same conclusion (that nvda was due to decline)

but I dont think its insider trading, just informed and reactive trading - not eoy profit trading either though

[strobeflier]

Fair. The existence of said paper makes this a normal trade based on publicly available information.