top | item 42884133

Xerox Alto Source Code (2014)

117 points| todsacerdoti | 1 year ago |computerhistory.org | reply

26 comments

order
[+] TomMasz|1 year ago|reply
The Alto is another example of what Xerox could have been had it not been so wedded to putting dots on paper. In my twenty years at Xerox I watched it slowly (and then quickly) shrink as the dots on paper market shrank.

In an alternative universe, Xerox is mentioned in the same breath as Apple, Google, and Microsoft.

[+] flyinghamster|1 year ago|reply
I always thought it was crazy that Xerox had all this ahead-of-the-time technology in its labs, yet when it released a commercial PC, what we got was the 820, a me-too CP/M system that came out just in time for the IBM PC to steamroll it.
[+] AdmiralAsshat|1 year ago|reply
It already is, though granted the phrasing is usually, "It was sure nice of Xerox to provide all that free technology for Apple and Microsoft."
[+] AdmiralAsshat|1 year ago|reply
Good book on the subject that I recently finished reading:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0029PBVCA

Does a pretty good job at running through PARC's founding and some of the many reasons why none of its amazing technology took off (Spoilers: it wasn't always Xerox interfering!).

[+] justin66|1 year ago|reply
> none of its amazing technology took off

The laser printer sure did. In his address to "startup school" at Stanford (marked private now in Youtube for some reason) Alan Kay pointed out that with the laser printer alone, money spent funding PARC earned something like a 250x return on investment for Xerox. (of course he had opinions about how they could have earned a lot more)

[+] jetrink|1 year ago|reply
The linked book is Dealers of Lightning: Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age by Michael A. Hiltzik, and I can second the recommendation.
[+] ellisd|1 year ago|reply
RIP to the Living Computers: Museum in Seattle… the last place I was ever able to use one of these machines in the flesh.
[+] rbanffy|1 year ago|reply
I was looking at the fonts and wondering if there is good documentation on how to read the files and convert them to modern bitmap formats (and, eventually, to non-bitmaps).

I reimplemented Cream for an Apple II educational program and it allowed the user to enter their name using it. I did that with a bit of imagination, the Take-1 Programmer's Toolkit (an awesome tool for the II) and a (Xerox, only now I notice the coincidence) photocopy of a BYTE article covering SmallTalk.

That long-running freelance job is probably why I didn't pursue a career as a hardware engineer and went deep into software.

[+] ChrisMarshallNY|1 year ago|reply
We had one of these, at my first job. I wasn’t allowed to use it. I wrote most of my stuff in WordStar.

Come to think of it, I’m not sure I ever saw anyone actually spending a lot of time, writing anything. Most of us were allowed to play with it, but we weren’t really allowed to sit at it, and write docs.

[+] sixothree|1 year ago|reply
Is it all html directories? Is there a zip or git so you can explore locally?
[+] pmcjones|1 year ago|reply
There's currently no way other than crawling the web site. The HTML and PDF files are intermingled with the original files.

(I'm the author of the blog post, walkthrough, and archive.)

[+] f1shy|1 year ago|reply
I’m having a hard time finding any source. Would somebody please help me?
[+] major4x|1 year ago|reply
Yeah, one of those machines (either the Palo or the Alto) was put on display near the entrance of the late Xerox PARC on Coyote hill (near VA). I was playing with the idea to power it but was told that it doesn't work anymore, at least the power supply is dead and allegedly there were also missing components... I suppose SRI will toss it soon if not already...
[+] knuckleheadsmif|1 year ago|reply
Never heard of the Xerox Palo computer and I worked at Xerox for much of the 80s. Xerox made a lot of different machines (mostly but not exclusive in the D-Machine family) but if there was a Palo machine I’d be interested in seeing a photo.