(no title)
yt-sdb | 1 year ago
And more generally, I would take almost no health advice from American footballers, many (most?) of whom will go into old age with ailments and injuries due how they treated their bodies.
yt-sdb | 1 year ago
And more generally, I would take almost no health advice from American footballers, many (most?) of whom will go into old age with ailments and injuries due how they treated their bodies.
lukas099|1 year ago
American football requires a different skill tree than world football. So of course if you only judge by the standards of world football he is not great. But why would you do that?
And athleticism as different from health. In fact, beyond a threshold I believe it is detrimental to it.
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
jghn|1 year ago
That is likely to wind up true when it's all said & done but Tom Brady still holds that title.
acatnamedjoe|1 year ago
Isn't it exactly the point of the article though that this doesn't necessarily mean elite across-the-board athleticism?
Your statement would also have described Tom Brady for most of his career, and I don't think anyone would seriously claim he was a 99%ile athlete (certainly not for sprinting, agility, etc.)
jjtheblunt|1 year ago
exceptione|1 year ago
fear91|1 year ago
recursivedoubts|1 year ago
AnimalMuppet|1 year ago
fear91|1 year ago
exceptione|1 year ago
Otherwise we would look at kick boxing.
jppope|1 year ago
Also your comment about Ronaldo is basically that he can jump high and run fast which makes him one of the greatest athletes? I think he's an amazing athlete but not because of his vertical jump. There were 30+ kids at my high school with a higher vertical jump than him.
The article's point is that there is more to athleticism than run fast, jump high. They are right.
naveen99|1 year ago
There are closer to a million professional actors… so actors in general are around 4 sd above average.
exar0815|1 year ago
https://youtu.be/dEkk7coK6Bs?si=2d37ssmtJtzv3Mp-