(no title)
emidoots | 1 year ago
Video for FPV quads on the other hand is divided: some use analog (mostly because when you lose signal, it's a gradual loss rather than complete loss + a reconnection process), while others use 802.11-based communication which is actually quite competitive. Walksnail Goggles for example use 802.11 for their video links, although not super open/documented people do dig into how it works (see Chris Rosser's work.) Latency is good enough with such setups for fast-paced competitive quad racing, at least
the__alchemist|1 year ago
Digital FPV (like DJI's system) looks vastly better than analog. I think the best comparison is: Digital looks like a modern movie, youtube video etc, and analog looks like CCTV footage from the 80s.
I will also clarify on ELRS: It uses ESP32, but it is a thin wrapper around Semtech LoRa (~915Mhz and 2.4Ghz) SX128x and SX126x chips, which are doing the heavy lifting.
mkesper|1 year ago
dji4321234|1 year ago
802.11 is not a good fit for FPV video and trying to use it has held non-proprietary-Chinese video systems back quite a lot.
Evidlo|1 year ago
IshKebab|1 year ago
I'm sure it exists, there probably just not much market for it.
bri3d|1 year ago