top | item 42911501

(no title)

mbostleman | 1 year ago

I don't see how this addresses my point. State rights is the ability of a state to act on their own - not have unfettered access to federal funds.

discuss

order

mindslight|1 year ago

When the federal government takes somewhere between 50% and 100% of the income tax payed by a state's citizens simply to give it back to the state with strings attached, that is a straightforward undermining of the state being able to act on its own.

In general, it's amazing how reliably crypto-authoritarian points are prefixed with "I don't see how". It exploits our natural advantage to assume good faith and difficulty understanding, rather than a willful ignoring of coercion.

_heimdall|1 year ago

Sure, but the GP you were replying to was focused on the risk of states losing federal funding and how that leverage is making many act differently in response.